Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-33574414-20170818154428/@comment-27385163-20170826205734

Coollittlepeashooter wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote:

Newspaper Zombie wrote: Mental Skillness wrote: Newspaper Zombie wrote: Mental Skillness wrote: Newspaper Zombie wrote: Mental Skillness wrote: Newspaper Zombie wrote: You're not having an opinion here though, you're just crying because you got yet another warning. You did a sh*t edit, you have done sh*t edits before too. An admin removed it and gave you a warning. Nothing wrong with that. Stop with the ego. you guys didn't even respond to my warning at all.

weird how everything i do is wrong, but when others do it, it's fine.

you just said "srsly? hes a troll lmao, ignore him"

if you don't feel like you have anything good to add to an appeal, then feel free to leave, because i'm not here to listen to the same nonsense come out of your mouth, it's gotten quite boring actually.

and your snarky behavior isn't even as entertaining as most of these kind of people. you see, at least zombiecrab is kinda funny because he doesn't understand, you just don't seem to get it, and act like you get it.

and, you're bringing in ego in an warning appeal. amazing. i guess asking for help is too much for me, because it's ms. Oh, I see, you can't argue with that so you decide to ignore everything I say. Classic MS for you.

And you deserved that warning. The admins know what they are doing. If it wasn't deserved, they would've removed it by now.

Oh wait, you'll just bring up that "hurr durr because ms" argument. what?

that was a direct response to what you wrote, and you're not providing any evidence, you're providing your own subjective thoughts and saying "i don't need to construct an argument, the admins know what they're doing because they're doing something in my favor". You're just ignoring everything I write, because I'm not agreeing with you. My fault for trying to reason with you. what???

did you even read what i wrote? it was a direct response, i'm sorry if you're illiterate or something, which in that case, i understand, but is it because i'm not having a specific response? i am directly responding to what you're saying.

or are you just trying to mock me by making fun of me for disproving your argument, because you can't make one.

hell, you're the one not responding, all you've said is "your not replyign to my argument" while i've been directly responding.

please come up with at least, a comprehensible response that makes sense, please. i know this may be hard for you, but just try. I'm not even trying to mock you. You're the repetitive one here. All you do is calling people repetitive and then writing walls of texts about how "their opinion is moronic".

And yes, I'm responding to your stuff. But you're way too ignorant to actually listen to what I'm saying. You're trying way too hard to make me look like a moron. ah, you're new to having an argument

so let me explain how this works for you

you enforce an opinion, and i bring mine forwards to trump yours

and whoever beats the other in then debate, then you, kind of win.

that's why i write little walls of text calling you out on your reptitive nature of an argument calling your opinion moronic while citing why because that's the nature of an argument.

and another mistake you've, once again, made is said that your opinion is so special that i cannot respond to it because "i'm too ignorant" while even you yourself don't understand what you're saying, so you're refusing to listen anything i say because "i'm too ignorant", rather than responding to what i say.

so, at the very least, try to use evidence, and more sensible claims is my tip. Use evidence? All you used here was "when will i get wwarning removed not fair waaah" and "stop repeating yourself omg" i believe you're misinformed because i explained in my appeal why the warning was wrong.

and you don't seem very good at arguing either, and you're misinformed as well, because the way an argument works is that somebody makes an argument, it gets either disproved, or you win from there. if it's disproved/countered, then you make a new one to counter the counter.

you don't repeat the same thing over and over again, because that's not how an argument works.

anyways back on topic, when can my warning be removed, because i've provided my own reasoning, and no one has really responded to that and addressed the appeal correctly.