Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-26895425-20140810150509/@comment-1764483-20140810231444

NapalmRosalina wrote: I don’t know if you mind, but for each item, I’ll try my best to defend myself. 1. NR got admin right after rollback, which is rushing: Where on earth in the rule book of wiki stated that getting an admin right after rollback is forbidden? Someone456 said in my ChatMod thread that as long as I met my requirements, it’s ok to do so. Besides, how can you find this behavior being “rude”? 2. Him, WM43, and JC03 accused me of "cheating" because I "ignored" a vote. That voter didn't have enough mainspace edits so I couldn't count it. Strike one. Also, saying "Can some admins vote please? Then we can all shut up," is impudent. Strike two. Last, when WM43 admitted I was "cheating", NR said, "Good job Wintermelon43!!!" Strike three. He's out: At that thread, 1 former Admin and 2 current admins think that you cheated, and I found that you cheated too at that time, that’s why I support those admins. Why don’t you try again a month later and count the vote carefully?

3. When Miles "framed" WM43, NR told Miles he hates him:

I know this part is my fault, but that was like when the time when I was just a normal user, several opposing vote were made because of this and I feel sorry afterwards, and now you talk about it again after like a month later? Also mister, MilesTailsPrower2 didn’t even blame me hard for that, instead it’s YOU doing this job.

4. He gave ambiguous reasons to support his interpretation of plants' Plant Food abilities, although he was correct. Assuming the armor's health was the same as the nut itself is a bad reason:

First, about the whole thing, is this behavior “rude”? Second, if I was correct, why on earth you should blame me for it, I am the one who should blame you for undo-ing all the correct information. And last, bad reasons for the nut, what is the problem with you? This is a wiki and people correct other’s mistakes into correct ones, mister.

5. He created a thread under the Wiki Management branch called "I only want admins and higher-class staffs to read this," that maligns me:

What is the problem with that, did I say anything wrong there? 100% truth, and I feel good about myself afterwards because I know I didn’t lie and searched for help from the admins and that time

If anything I said above have any sorts of dishonesty, I don’t mind to leave now. And also, next time if you want to write my name in pronouns, please stat: they/them.

Your grammar is suck, and the use of "they" and "them" as singular is debatly incorrect. Good day.
 * 1) No one said it was against the rules. It's just that it seems power hungry and we're not sure if you're ready for it...
 * 2) Let's do it like this:
 * 3) *Strike one: THE VOTER DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH EDITS. THAT DIDN'T COUNT.
 * 4) *Strike two: Yes, you ARE being rude. And I didn't remember it being HIGHLIGHTED.
 * 5) *Strike three: You are encouraging faulty behavior. What do you have to say for yourself?
 * 6) *Strikeout: So? It's not like all our staff is RELIABLE, including YOU.
 * 7) First of all, it's "Milesprower2". Second of all, just because it was a month and you're sorry for it now doesn't mean that you can STILL be rude. It nullifies being sorry in general and (unless you later make up for it, like Theymaqn), you are LUCKY MP2 took it easy on you.
 * Ugh, you're being rude, and I mean MeVsZombiesMeWin rude. At least he's funny nowadays. But back on the subject, if HIS information WAS correct, then what?
 * 1) That's POWER ABUSE and BULLYING. You don't make threads directly attacking other people. That's common sense and you know it.