Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-9944069-20170402173916/@comment-7091122-20170406000217

Bearjedi wrote: Camwood777 wrote: I really feel like mentioning the amount of effort it'd take for how little you gain from this again, because I see a lot of people glossing over that... Bearjedi wrote: AWikiBoy521 wrote:

View full site? Tabs also still work on the mobile skin too, for your information. Besides, GW infoboxes use it as well.

So this vote is disqualified as your argument was proven false. Buddy, listen to me, and listen to me well.

Don't make the mistakes I did, and don't, I repeat, don't pull that crap. He voted purely based on his doubts. A counter-argument =/= a valid reason to disqualify a vote, as far as I'm aware of.

Listen, don't pull this sort of thing. I thought that it was okay to disqualify via counter-arguments when I did the one vote thread for Plant Genders, and nobody liked it, to the point a vote was made to auto-disqualify any disqualification that only used that as a basis, and it passed.

I don't want a repeat of obvious mistakes. Especially when it's a dumb mistake I made. Doubly so if it's by someone who's actually not me.

(Not to mention you didn't even mention if the tabber was any good...)