Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20170617134530/@comment-7091122-20170619171958

I feel as though a lot of people seemingly forget what a dictator even does. So, let's see:
 * They are the ONLY person in power. Others can be supposedly in power, but in reality, it is them and them alone who has the control.
 * Sample: It's the very definition of dictator. Do I really need an example?
 * When their power is threatened, they will often shoot down any attempts to threaten it, by any means necessary. Silencing them, imprisonment, or even murder. While some aren't viable for a wiki, warnings, blocks, and other forms of editing/deletion can be a substitute that can be just as bad.
 * Sample: Just look at this thread. Jack closed this thread not once, but twice, in order to silence this vote.
 * If they do something, and you don't like it, you have no say in if it stays. They're the ones in power, and even if you dislike it, if they are okay with it, it'll stay. Yes, even if the entire community hates something, if they happen to like it, and want it to stay, it will stay.
 * Sample: If a strategy makes no sense, but the dictator likes it, it will be allowed to stay. Conversely, if a strategy makes sense, but the dictator dislikes it, it will be removed.
 * They don't need to follow the rules, and can get away with anything, even if it's immoral, incorrect, or defies the rules they have set. Even if you can't swear, they can likely get away with swearing themselves, and face nothing for it.
 * Sample: Our current U.S. president has been accepting gifts from foreign countries due to his past businesses. This defies the constitution. Currently, nothing has happened because of this.
 * A dictator can force you into doing things, and, like it or not, you have to do them. By definition, they can and will be able to do this. If you disobey, you will suffer punishments. Again, while some of these are not viable on wikis, warnings, blocks, and other things can still suffice.
 * Sample: Where do you think the "dictate" part came from?
 * A dictator is not nice, and is very strict. By nature, if someone is a dictator, they will not be willing to be accepting of anything they dislike. If they were, they would not be a dictator at that point; best-case scenario, they would be an absolute monarchy.
 * Sample: Adolf Hitler, Mussolini, Kim Jong-un, Stalin, Saddam Hussein, the list goes on. All of these people were strict and cruel to some degree.
 * Dictators have a history of tampering with information. While this can amount to just editing people out of images, at worst, this can mean editing historical information to suit their needs. This is a MASSIVE concern for a Wiki; if a dictator wishes to do that, they single-handedly cripple a portion of the wiki, to the point of almost being feasibly considered an act of misinformation and vandalism. And, given their other attributes, they can do this whether you like that or not.
 * Sample: The most famous example is the image with Joseph Stalin, where he had Nikolai Yezhov removed from the picture. Hitler also did it.

'''Given the current percentile, this will fail, and the dictatorship rule will be removed. This means that some of you people want this to be allowed on our wiki. You are okay with only one person being in power, with them shooting down any attempts to remove their power, you having no say in what happens, you being forced to do things unless you want a punishment, to be ruled by a cruel, strict person, and have the information on the wiki tampered with, for everyone both editing and reading it.'''