Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-25368137-20161014020321/@comment-24024415-20161015004208

Light Bomber wrote: TheO0032 wrote:

Nitromian Poptropica wrote:

TheO0032 wrote: Okay. That was not my intent.

My intent: To lessen the role of mainspace edits, so people like me could still do things relating to the wikia.

Not my intent: To put up a thread that would keep me from doing what I was doing.

I will add a choice:

If on the wiki management thread, 100 mainspace edits, and at least a month on the wiki.

If on any other topic, 10 mainspace edits is enough.

And still, a month on the wikia.

Since I cannot vote, I cannot vote for it, but nothing prohibits me from putting it up. Then again, rather than mentioning stuff like this, couldn't you just start mainspace editing to vote already? I worked quite hard to get the 3 I have. How could I get 25? I have 100 something, it's not too difficult if you  just look to fix vandalism/minor edits/strategies

Well vandalism and minor edits are spurred by other users alone, making a main source of edits for new people inconsistant and likely to be absorbed by other, much more devoted and consistant users that already have their rights.

Strategy is also a very limited source of edits. Since most plants are used as a meta and some of the more vibrent and unique strategies work on gimmicks and tend to be inefficient, most cases would list the obvious strategy and the rest would be neglected. Eventually the strategy created by a new user either is faulty because they are new to the fandom/try to hard to differentiate itself from the others or repetative since the obvious choices are there.