User blog comment:Brainulator9/My rant blog... again/@comment-7234182-20140807160955/@comment-7234182-20140807163344

@Brainulator All of them, and start over. We hold new elections in which a reduced number of admins will be chosen. Anyone who wants to be an admin can put forward their application. These applications can be commented on by fellow candidates, admins, and members of the community who can support or oppose the candidate. These comments can be made anonymously to protect users from potential future harassment.

Then, the community gets to elect a new (and reduced!) admin staff with anonymous votes. I suggest using a voting system similar to the one used in Australia (look up single transferable voting). This is a bit idealized, since it assumes there will be enough voters, and voters are well informed about the candidates. But I still think it would be better than what we have now.

After the admins are elected, they should be allowed to hold their position indefinitely unless they display inappropriate behavior for an admin, or become inactive.

Of course this would require someone to oversee the entire process and keep admins in check. Since it looks like both founders are inactive at the moment, we'd need a system in which the admins keep each other in check.