Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-9944069-20171123212406/@comment-29611741-20171124143948

Reapeageddon wrote: YammaYamer21 wrote:

Reapeageddon wrote:

CaptainRustbolt21 wrote: Oh, my god- TO EVERYONE WHO IS WANTING TO REMOVE THE RP BRANCH! GET. A. FREAKING. LIFE! You all like fun, correct? True, we all have different means of fun, but the Roleplaying Branch is MY favorite pastime! Many of us LOVE the Roleplay Branch! Normally, I respect one's opinion, but NOT THIS TIME! I can't believe I'm gonna say this but... SCREW YOUR OPINION, BEARJEDI!!!

I need a break. If you are offended about some voting thread to the point where you would say something like "SCREW YOUR OPINION," should WE be the ones who should get a life... or you?

Darn, no "Other" vote?

If there WAS, I would have put some rules making sure the roleplays aren't considerd "spam." Maybe a rule like "make sure the story is..." idk, something? Like, we wouldn't want any bad fanfic stories, but good ones that have proper pacing and character development.

''How about this? ''

It may not be the best idea, but here it goes.

You mean 2 and 3, if I’m understanding correctly.

Also, can I say that the person who made this thread did a really impressive job at completely ignoring the other side of the argument and trying to split that side’s votes? Seriously, seeing threads like these almost make me want to become a forum mod just to delete and remake them so they’re less horribly biased, both in terms of voting and descriptions.

In the unlikely case that someone can’t get my gripe with the voting, let’s just say that options 2 and 3 are just two ways to obtain the same goal.

I’m not going to vote just yet but honestly if you know me in the slightest you should already know what I’m gonna vote. I said Choice 1 and 3 since you're sorta removing a PART of the RP branch, which is the ones who make roleplays that prioritize making crossovers rather than a legit lovable story. You’re removing a pet of the RP branch to place it in the F&G section(Option 3) and keeping the rest in the RP branch(Option 2).