Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-27462035-20170820215643/@comment-27385163-20170905134618

VeXJL wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote:

How is it you rely on guesses with the other method? All plants are gender-neutral and one quick look at the zombie tells you the gender. i can see how emotionally invested you are in this stupid vote, so i'll just stay out of your way and watch this go down. i have no interest in the mainspace, because i don't understand why it's so pettily important to have plants be referred to as genderless, or not.

it's just not something i'd invest myself in, so sorry if my atiitude comes off as "careless" or "condescending".

i feel like just sticking to descriptions is a much better way to use gender pronoun than going off of a method that screams lazy. could you at least had been creative enough to maybe create a list of some sort of genders to stick to.

maybe we could have a poll to have conjectoral genders for the plants and zombies that don't have one, that sounds like a much better idea than sticking with "all plants are genderless". and if one is updated with information that confirms said gender, we should change it.

but as i said, i really don't see the big deal with genders and plants.