Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-29326052-20161014235315/@comment-24024415-20161016115246

SnappyDragon wrote: Legofan9o5 wrote: Brainulator9 wrote: Okay, I could have given examples. That said, the depiction is so generic and weak that if you can't handle that, then prepare to live under a rock all your life. I guess you could say it is NSFW, but by that logic, chat profanity should be against the rules, but it isn't, so...

I get that someone else felt uncomfortable with that joke, but is that really something to hold against one person, or the rules permitting such comments? He's technically not doing anything wrong.

While that comment wasn't serious, it was not meant to be funny per se. This alone nullifies more than half of your comment.

New people seeing that as legitimate? Well, clearly, someone's never heard of how Internet culture works. :3333333  kick if even mentioning the bot, that just paints too many negative first impressions for me. Specialedition12: "ok u suck go kys" So let me get this completely straightened out:

Specialedition12 threatened you with a typical "kys", which you see as miscounduct on their behaviour, resulting in a kick. Fine, good. Actuall proof that you are doing your job...

...except that SE12 threatened you with lethal violence, when you are the one who created and operated the bot that literally threatened not just lethal violence, but gratuitous and disrutbed levels of detail.

I'm sorry, but your actions in this case paint a perfect picture of a hypocite. No exageration, no joking, your bot actions here and your mod responce there truely clash with each other.