Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27853587-20161006191618/@comment-1764483-20161011102241


 * 1) Wouldn't this complicate counting edits further? I see where you're getting at, but in practice, I'm kind of iffy on if it'll work.
 * 2) Two things:
 * 3) Content moderators, administators, bureaucrats, Helpers, VSTF members, and Wikia Staff all have rollback powers immediately. The last three don't pertain to this website, but still.
 * 4) Don't we have something like this already, or is this just a plug to eradicate rollback-only positions?
 * 5) Reverting vandalism at least ten times does sound like a good idea. Question: is this website really one that is persistently vandalized? The worst we've seen, by my memory and others' experiences, are sockpuppet-filled infestations of Nazi Peashooter and MaxStories, both of which were a while back. Granted, it could happen sometime, and the U.S. Constitution has a means of ratifying amendments that is seldom used, but this is different given how they likely expected the alternate method to be used more often, while in our case, we... don't.
 * 6) Too bad forum moderators (or did you mean discussion moderators? :3) are already chat moderators by default, and administrators are automatically forum (and content) moderators.
 * 7) To give you credit, you at least made the original method an option. That said, I see where you're getting at (especially concerning that any non-deserving users may be denied these powers). It's just that the "edit for 300 days" requirement can be really painstaking to track, whereas every other requirement can be tracked easily and quickly.