Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20170617134530/@comment-27769607-20170619215533

OK so, a lot of people are saying that the rule is POINTLESS. It is the majority of the time, since I trust the B-crats to not ban everyone and take over the wiki. However, it is a possibility. Removing the rule will give freedom to the B-crats to do this without having this rule there. This rule can enforce the no's. We do not want the B-crats to demote and ban everyone. '''Putting this rule there does not harm the wiki in any way but rather helps it. '''It's not like these few extra bits of text will take up too much storage or anything. It's not COMPLETELY pointless, as it also has psychological effects.

Not putting a rule on dictatorship is a problem. If we do not put any rules regarding this issue, people can have the freedom to do whatever they want. We do not want to put a rule that says "we are allowed to dictate" or "we can dictate if we want". Do you really want those rules there????? If we do not put a rule about no dictatorship on, it is equivalent to putting a rule about allowing dictatorship. If you do not say "no dictatorship" then there can be dictatorship.

What bad effects does putting this rule on have to the wiki? NOTHING. So put it there. It's not pointless.