Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-5079138-20160204143707/@comment-26988423-20160205005416

BF10 wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

BF10 wrote:

Ancestor of Ancient Pult Ancestor wrote:

BF10 wrote:

Dung Dinh Anh wrote: This ancestor thing had happened a few months ago if I remember correctly (Insert Your Name Here was a victim). And very sillfully, MaxStories made a User:Ancestor of MaxStories Yes It's Me Ancient Pult Ancestor I Am MaxStories Too. Great job. Now wait for your ban.

DatDramaPlant wrote:

BF10 wrote:

Dung Dinh Anh wrote: This ancestor thing had happened a few months ago if I remember correctly (Insert Your Name Here was a victim). And very sillfully, MaxStories made a User:Ancestor of MaxStories Also, Lolwutburger and MysteryKing were also victims. Are you sure Max made that? You know what, can we not veer towards this part? Why are you still continuing to defend Max? I have my reasons! Why does NO ONE everylisten? Because how many times did you see MaxStories vandal here. Proof also includes "Steven Universe". I admit, he did make some quite a few sockpuppets, but you don't have to go all "MaxStories is in the username he is 100% Max". Please. We don't have to live in the past. Look, you're giving other vandals chances to put targets on Max's back. So can we just stop assuming every single vandal with "MaxStories" in the username is him? Because seriously!

That wasn't insulting, right?