Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-4902297-20151126195441/@comment-4902297-20151129204804

I'll try and respond to as many queries as I can with this post.

Every action I've taken so far has been to foster progress with the inactivity scenario. To be honest, I could care less whether it's 2 weeks or 2 months. I just want something to be agreed upon. This is why I fasttracked the 2-3 weeks proposal. It seened to be getting the most support from others when I initially said it. I apologize for seeming absuive or unfair to any who deemed me as such, but that's not changing my decisions. I don't see us getting anywhere unless we pick a time and vote. Would 1 month gain just as much support through voting? Probably. However, the reverse is also true, and it's honestly way too small of an issue to fight over. If this succeeds, and if it turns out 1 month is a better time, then we'll make a new vote for that. Let's just see how this works out.

As for questions regarding my proposal:
 * The 2-3 weeks would tend to lean towards 3 weeks in most cases.
 * '''Demoted users WILL get their rights back upon request
 * "Retired" bureaucrats would be exempt from this rule, though the definition of retirement is another discussion for another time. For now, we'll leave them be.
 * Cases like DeathZombi's would fall under the "special exceptions" tab.

Last but not least, I am truly sorry for not posting this earlier. I'm actually considering extending the vote time for this discussion, if only to make sure everyone has a grasp on what they are voting on. I feel as if I am partly to blame for the conflict in this thread because of my failure to check this discussion in the past two days.