Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27138615-20170706081614/@comment-25388055-20170709003959

Brainulator9 wrote: Zazme Yakuza wrote:

Brainulator9 wrote:

BF10 wrote: Including PurplePi and Slythern Potter? Uh... yes. Playing off of DeathZombi, but if we leave these guys off because something something "bad people", then I guess Genghis Khan, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and other tyrants can be lost to history. I mean, it's not like less people knowing about a certain person and their actions will prevent people from knowing about the effects of such actions. The thing is we all consider that this are all bad people, but they are not they did good things too, it is from a point of view an perspective, they got leadership because it was decided the appointed one has the ability to preserve and protect something, if he doesn't go the people's way, then it's the people who voted for him who is at fault, because primarily they have the power to appoint who they like, this is the same philosophy to Christianity and Satanism, many people think that Satan is the bad one and for the Satanism is other way around, that's why we put who we promote because we trusted them, whether they did something or not. But that point aside we site it like history.Example: "Joseph Stalin was the primary leader of Russia and he advocated communism as a philosophical thought but sadly many people saw this as a uneffective way that's why he was impeached of his position." It would be better if that was the same with PurplePi, we should cite what happen so that other people would understand I know you're agreeing with me, but perspective doesn't matter when the content is meant to be neutral.

Nitpick, but is the Joseph Stalin example you gave meant to be historically accurate?

Not really just an example of a neutral description so that users would just read not react to it.