Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-26130601-20161125180353/@comment-25368137-20161126170430

If rollback's 100 ms edit is so low, and so "bad" for an user to have, why not increase it?

I fail to see how it's so problematic to have the REQUIRED ammount, compared to the AMMOUNT YOU GUYS WANT.

If it's so bad to have just 100 ms edits, why don't you increase that to 200 or something then? The "starter" position (Rollback) shouldn't be demanded to have much more than the required/minimum ammount. I doubt this guy would actually vandalize pages or so with this power, or how he would "fail horribly because he has 100 ms edits" give him a chance, and if things go too wrong, just give him more time to get better.

I'm not voting, because i'm not here anymore. I agree with Murabito, Ballistic Planet and others who have supported him, for basically this reason: It's the easiest right to obtain, it's literally the weakest as well (you just have a quick "undo last edit" button and the abillity to edit forum comments and such) so why all the hate for him not having way more than 100 ms edits?