Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-26583782-20161219202554/@comment-29611741-20161223222837


 * sigh*

Honestly, he is both A) Always going to be here, and B) Kind of good for the wikia.

A) There will always be someone, whether idiotic or beyond intelligent, that will find a good reason to go against the popular vote/opinion. The matter of the fact is, there is always a way to view things to justify it, whether it involves a different (possibly)realistic view or the omission or addition of semi-important details.

B) If there is a vote(for something other than an application for a staff position) that has 100% confirmation, there are three cases of what's happening with the wikia:

1. The wikia was too dim-witted to think of it up until that point,

2. It's something that happens often and the rules should be changed so we don't have to waste energy to lift our fingers and allow it, or

3. Everyone that's voting has lost all ability to think for themselves.

I get that it's a bit of an extreme example, but if we don't have someone that at least tries to show the negatives of a decision that we all(more or less) mindlessly bandwagon onto, then the only point of the voting thread is to say "Hey, we're going to do this and you're going to like it!" No, we need to know why we're going to like it and if there might be a part we don't like. Thus, we need something to prompt discussion, even if it's a troll comment.