Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20160914034136/@comment-30014209-20160914221229

Ballistic Planet wrote:

Elemec wrote:

Ballistic Planet wrote:

Elemec wrote:

Ballistic Planet wrote:

Elemec wrote:

Ballistic Planet wrote:

Elemec wrote: Now, i've never mentioned on the reasoning (I could edit but that would be a bit too long, at least imo) on why Wikia Chat/Lawn should stay.

Let's see, all the features it has over Discord (including one that isn't fixed because of lazyness and admins)

Youtube videos/Images can (could) be displayed instantly, from chat itself, via chat hacks (if it wasn't by some problematic code)

Customization of appearence overall (Fonts, font colors, glowing avatars, "self" backgrounds, glowing fonts, animations, images besides your name)

Multi-PMs

Chat logging (Historic of everything that was said and happened during chat, assuming a chat logger/chat bot is on)

A "Spam bar stopper" (Stops the scroll bar from going too up if someone is spamming, useful incase a spammer comes or too many people are talking at the same time, quickly)

Search bar & Tab complete, Ping (Everything else i think it's already included in Discord)

And, much better performance, even when chat is alive, specially, if you're using the ?usesitecss=0 trick. 7. Performance is literally just a matter of Computer. On my Computer, Discord performs way better than wikia chat ever could.

My argument. So, because your computer can run a really laggy and badly optimized game at 60 fps, it's good, but a sightly better optimized, but still laggy game runs at 58 fps for you, it's horrible?

Beautiful. Since when did I complain that wikia chat was slightly worse in terms of performance? I complained that is was a heck of a lot worse time and time again. You mentioned "Discord running better than wiki chat ever did" so, obviously you meant there's a "very bad performance" Yes, but your analogy of 60 fps vs 58 fps made me assume that you were talking about a minimum difference. I mentioned that, because, if your computer can run Discord well, it obviously *will* run Wikia well, even if it glitches  a bit here and there, here it's been performing better, and this is a pretty "budget" computer, as it's pretty much a very old computer with cheap "new" parts that aren't really new.

As far as i know, it only really crashes (To me, at least) when i'm using blink (Or whatever is the name of google's engine) or if i have my chatbot on without chat hacks, because as soon as the 10 min mark passes, it will try to log but fail due to chathacks not being on, and that *will* crash anything. Maybe it's a thing where you're running the most optimal Wikia Chat setup (FireFox really does work the best) vs the suboptimal Discord setup (the Desktop/Mobile application performs much better than the Broswer app generally).

I use the Discord Application, although I use Google Chrome for wikia chat, which is less optimized than FireFox. Maybe that's why we have such a discrepancy in performance. Well, i think i was using the *almost* optimal Wikia Chat setup when i compared and did the essay (I did it weeks ago) the most optimal one would be Firefox (I used before and still use) + ?usesitecss=0 (Use nowadays, but didn't use on the day i wrote the essay) and i can guarantee it runs very well here nowadays, a lot better than with the css, but well, with that, better than Discord on firefox