Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-5143323-20180113035227/@comment-5760976-20180315112007

DatDramaPlant wrote: oof I didn't even realise not all staff were in on the discord Honestly I feel the same way that PoRa is being a little too impatient and desperate, which seems like a confirmation of my fear that staff are doing this because they're desperate for more control.

Like when PoRa announced to "revive" this thing on discord, he made ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. He was like "let's make it official and implement it" and my first reaction was: You mean it wasn't implemented yet? Given the zero voting threads between then and now, I'd automatically assumed that this was now the system and... people just no longer cared or left since activity has decreased dramatically.

You know, looking back, I asked whether it would be permanent about thrice and since there was no saying it would be I assumed we were sticking to the plan of temporary, and we actually DISCUSSED WHEN THIS THING WOULD END. But nope apparently we can't make up our damn minds or are just desperate, because suddenly oh look it's permanent.

To all staff (particularly admins), please, no arbitary deadlines, short timeframes for opposers to react and if you can't keep to that, at least don't contradict each other or yourself. I mean, look at this thread. How many times are you going to flip between temporary and permanent?

There's a reason why we repealed the whole remove the dictatorship rule thing. Apparently a staff-controlled system isn't much better because let's be honest, you may deny it, but staff can have their own agenda surprisingly more often that you would think. I have a Discord and I'm not in it. Even if it does happen, I wouldn't care enough just because I'm already "busy" elsewhere and I don't want to be a part of something that seems to be cheating itself to give certain people power.