Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-7530765-20150502162439/@comment-25089892-20150502230107

1Zulu wrote:

TheHandsomePlant wrote:

How many reasons you have on supporting and how many on opposing? Most supports here mean "I agree", "we should do it", "this is good option", so it's quite obvious it doesn't need a reason. Oppose, on the other hand, can have multiple or even dozens of reasons like "I don't care", "Because lies r cool", "Because x, x and x" etc.

But why do you agree?

I can play this game too. Why can't the opposes mean "I disagree," "we should not do it," "this is a bad option"? Why do I only need to explain my reasoning if I disagree? I agree because this is a good and obvious idea. I guess the majority of users here voted the same so it didn't need th reason.

Most users can easily wonder what are the reasons for supporting. But then, think about it. Someone opposes. And you get to mind: heck, why is he doing this?