Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2: It's About Time/@comment-25580460-20150213150038/@comment-1764483-20150218224832

ZombieNinja723 wrote: Brainulator9 wrote: Milesprower2, respect other's opinions, dammit! -_-

I like Fire Peashooter to a respect. Ignoring the Plant Food effect, the plant is PERFECT in terms of balancing. Although there are more powerful options (not that I'm going to let other plants ruin a single plant for me), it is well designed without Pepper-pult's BS recharge speed.

My complaints about it are two things:

The PF deals freaking 175 damage. It should be reduced to about 80-100 (since it's AoE). I agree that it's well balanced. The pros of the Fire Peashooter are that it is cheaper than the Repeater, it thaws plants, ande it's PF is AoE, but the cons are that it defrosts chilled and frozen zombies, and it's attack are not AoE. The pros and cons easily counter each other out. And as for you Miles, please respect other people's opinions. 175 damage? Damn-age!
 * The PF, while awesome, is too OP. It cannot kill a Gargantuar whole, at least from what I've tested, but it CAN overkill Robo-Cone Zombies. If it were up to me, I would make it shoot 60 fire peas and give a fire trail like Snow Pea's ice trail, but make it defrost zombies and instantly melt all ice blocks on it, and give out one pulse per second like Torchwood's PF. Maaaaaybe the fire trail can deal 60 or 90 NDS, just for flavor, but would that be OP?
 * The name is pathetically unoriginal. This isn't China or Garden Warfare or Chinese Garden Warfare where you can that off, PopCap. It really should have been called "Flaming Pea", as a homage to Adventures and so it's NOT pathetic. Was PopCap TRYING to avoid the return of Carp or something? I dunno.