Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-26169720-20160430191535/@comment-5760976-20160430205754

Itsleo20 wrote: Lily8763cp wrote: Elemec wrote: Zam-Bot was an attempt of making a chatbot for our wiki. Not a sock. and a failed chat bot would be a reason to oppose because...? If a recall correctly, you were the one who said "please explain why it shouldn't be a valid reason to oppose you." Because, the way he said it in the "rules of voting" thing made it sound like it was a sock puppet or something bad like that.