Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170207035621/@comment-24024415-20170210003253

YammaYamer21 wrote: Camwood777 wrote:


 * Except, there's zero indication that they do, indeed, have differing genders. They're basically treated as a bunch of individuals with the same gender. Kinda like conjoined twins, if you would.

After a rule was hastily added to prevent so much as voting on it for 6 months due to how much bias against it there was, it really does become a concern that there's biased votes being made blindly when it comes to this topic.

Well, why aren't there people going around replying to every support with why they think they're wrong? And why is there a list of reasons that can't be used to oppose but no list for invalid supporting reasons, and users disqualifying "invalidly reasoned" opposes yet not supports like SuperGaming's? This thread as a whole is really damned biased, IMO, yet from what I can tell, Oppose still takes up the majority against the wave of Disqualifications.
 * Twin Sunflower's old Almanac entry said that one of them might be an evil twin, hinting that it is possible for multiple-headed plants to have different personalities. For confirmation, tell me how it's Threepeater's middle head that cheats, and not all of them.

Maybe there just isn't any opposers who are dedicated enough to their side that they don't try to refute the other side's opinions as much? Isn't the list there because we've already ruled those reasons out based on logical discussion, and that supports simply were not as obvious on infringing on logical basis than opposition? And if you truly think that some votes are false, then why don't you contest them yourself rather than complain that others are not?
 * Still does not indicate a change in gender, and that assumption is just that, a massive assumption without any actual example in the game.