Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-26169720-20160424084603/@comment-27138615-20160427155443

Zambiealex wrote: Marcia Aeris wrote:

Zambiealex wrote: 75% of new users who come to this wiki are bad but 25% are just giving knowledge of the game but Admins and B-Crats are just blocking and kicking. Wikia is a loving and creative website. Not a blocking 'n' ban place. If Wikia Inc saw the logs of blocks what will they say? Even if the Username and Almanac is good you will still ban them? Even if they don't harass others you will ban them? I know you are doing this to protect this wiki but set an example that shows your love. We try to have good faith. We're just trying to keep this wiki safe and they're the people, asking for bans. We ban people for spamming and being disruption only, and even if you're not insulting another user, disruption isn't good either. We're just giving sockpuppets what they deserve, and we also eventually have to be stern. Doesn't mean we instaban people doesn't mean we're ruthless and blockthirsty. One word. "Unless"

You can be that person that can make a difference... Unfortunately, most of the people who use sockpuppetry deserve instabans if they do something suspicious. I know this is cheesy, but being nice isn't always the solution, we need to be stern.