Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-25083348-20151116174935/@comment-25083348-20151116193000

Ballistic Planet wrote: ShroomstagramUser wrote: Ballistic Planet wrote: BLACK OUT wrote: Ballisitic, before we name names, we should define flashy and inactive first. Haven't we already gotten a bsic outline on it, though? While inactive isn't clearly defined and is basically "haven't contributed for a while", haven't we defined flashy as "someone who gets promoted just for fame"? But it is hard to tell which of these staff members is flashy and which isn't. Well if that's an issue, let's slow down and define inactive first. While generally in the past we've set inactive as like 1-2 months without activity, what should it actually be? The basic definition of inactive is not editing for long periods of time. I'd say 2 weeks or more.