Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-26470588-20170323213644/@comment-26988423-20170325095714

Teacup Terry wrote: The argument that i'm seeing most often is "Rollbacks are only bad edit reverters. Their purpose is not to be grammatical."

That doesn't make sense. Rollbacks are not only edit reverters. They still have to make edits. You see rollbacks doing tons of mainspace. Do you think every single one is an undo? No, of course not. They still have to do regular edits and you shouldn't let them run free plastering bad grammar and spelling on every page when they do so. The thing is that, are you going to stop people from getting a rank due to a reason that is completely irrelevant to the rights given with the position?