Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20170617134530/@comment-4024597-20170618154132

Hal lucination wrote: Dung Dinh Anh wrote: Hal lucination wrote: Dung Dinh Anh wrote:

Hal lucination wrote:

Then why not just do it here? This thread is technically about whether we should keep the rule or not. No, the thing is, do we let someone who took out a rule without any vote whatsoever get away with it because the rule is flawed? We shouldn't let Jack get his way given that he got his way without any vote on the topic the first time. I get that Jack is wrong in removing the rule without other staff's knowledge but why do we need another thread to see if the rule should stay or not if this thread is doing the same? What if the new thread gets supported/opposed and the rule is removed again, wouldn't that be redundant? I don't think you see my point. My point is Jack did this without any votes whatsoever. If the new thread gets supported, at least it won't be at the direction of Jacks action of originally removing it. I can see your point perfectly that Jack did wrong, I'm just proposing the idea of merging this thread and the "Keep the rule or not" vote.