Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27462035-20170314065758/@comment-27462035-20170314080242

Yuanie wrote: VeXJL wrote: Yuanie wrote: A) Poor reason to vote and probably indicating bias;

B) There are so many people that can vote, and new people may not understand the content, thus making the vote more inaccurate, especially if they blind voted;

C) That is exactly the point I'm bringing. New people have a problem with templates. Personally, I find it ok if you think it's a poor reason, but bias? Oh, great... so new people have a problem with templates. Can't anyone just at least set up a link to Wikia or something teaching people to make a template? Plus if you put blind voted you could just remove it or ask the person like you did to me. Additionally, if you do not understand the content then you can just not vote. There were some forums that I did not understand and I left them alone. Also in 2 weeks, some people might not have enough time or something.

Still, if you disagree:

Again, you might find it invalid, but I'm going with it this time. I said that 50 is better because getting 35 edits doesn't award you with a badge, and it's harder to tell if someone meets the requirements. EditCount is sometimes innaccurate, and Pinacoin was a victim of this innaccuracy.

Also, Wikia doesn't really show you much about voting templates. And hoh, boy, I can't just disqualify a vote for blind voting. Most of the time, even when I suspect someone of doing that, I don't have proof.