Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-29326052-20161031004702/@comment-28987058-20161101163110

Pinkgirl234 wrote: Strawburst18 wrote: Foxtail Firepaw Flames wrote: In response to your "He directed swears towards people"

Your biggest mistake is that you provide absolutely no evidence whatsoever. It's a He-Said-She-Said piece, and 'I saw it', really molds your case. I really watch myself, and I have no intentions of swearing towards others. It breaks a high-class rule, and if so, why haven't I been kicked then? That's an offense that requires an automatic ban or a simplistic kick. And this was done in discord,which required discord related action. You've reported the case to the wrong department and have no evidence. Wow, Copper. And that's just one of your points.

In response to your "He left cold replies"

For one, you did it again. You reported the case, to the wrong department. I can't get a ban for something that happened on a blog, a warning, yes, but not a ban because it has no relations to chat, at all. And another mistake is that you tied the punishment to discord, which is a huge mistake as a defense. And, I'm getting the thought that you are not doing this to help the community, but yourself. There is a slight sense of biased in here, which is honestly extremely unprofessional in the experience of making arrests. I left a reply like that because you made a petty comeback or reply to an opposing force of an idea, and tried to cause massive amounts of negative attention towards you. Personally, I think you deserve it, but I digress.

In response to "He posted NSFW"

For one, that was a complete accident, and the Discord Management, and I had an understanding of the incident, and we agreed on it to prevent a punishment because it was a slip. I thank the discord management team for being very understanding, but Copper, you're not even part of such, let alone report a case the Discord Management already closed. Very unprofessional, and not enough research. It's leaking of bias, in all honesty. I really can't say anything at all other than a rereported closed case done out of personal bias, which is a red flag. Let's move onto the next reason, everyone.

In response to "He insulted Harry"

I was protecting Harry because I, myself, thought was a bad idea to share personal experiences on the internet, and like before, does not tie in with chat or discord. And overall, is true. COPPA literally exists to protect children from doing things like that. I am not making the case that Harry is underaged, but perhaps from a behavioral standpoint, a little naive, and I'm standing for him. I may confirm its existence, but you didn't even bother to bring evidence or even take a picture which really goes to show how much you don't care at all.

I'm not even going to tackle the "Due to ban evasion", because I have never been banned on Discord, and I've never Ban Evaded on PvZW Chat. You provided absolutely no evidence at all. I may not be trained to take cases to court, but as someone who would, I'd call this case closed.

Someone TL;DR this.