Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20160914034136/@comment-30014209-20160914182253

Ballistic Planet wrote:

Elemec wrote:

Ballistic Planet wrote:

Elemec wrote: Now, i've never mentioned on the reasoning (I could edit but that would be a bit too long, at least imo) on why Wikia Chat/Lawn should stay.

Let's see, all the features it has over Discord (including one that isn't fixed because of lazyness and admins)

Youtube videos/Images can (could) be displayed instantly, from chat itself, via chat hacks (if it wasn't by some problematic code)

Customization of appearence overall (Fonts, font colors, glowing avatars, "self" backgrounds, glowing fonts, animations, images besides your name)

Multi-PMs

Chat logging (Historic of everything that was said and happened during chat, assuming a chat logger/chat bot is on)

A "Spam bar stopper" (Stops the scroll bar from going too up if someone is spamming, useful incase a spammer comes or too many people are talking at the same time, quickly)

Search bar & Tab complete, Ping (Everything else i think it's already included in Discord)

And, much better performance, even when chat is alive, specially, if you're using the ?usesitecss=0 trick. 7. Performance is literally just a matter of Computer. On my Computer, Discord performs way better than wikia chat ever could.

My argument. So, because your computer can run a really laggy and badly optimized game at 60 fps, it's good, but a sightly better optimized, but still laggy game runs at 58 fps for you, it's horrible?

Beautiful. Since when did I complain that wikia chat was slightly worse in terms of performance? I complained that is was a heck of a lot worse time and time again.

You mentioned "Discord running better than wiki chat ever did" so, obviously you meant there's a "very bad performance"