Board Thread:Roleplaying/@comment-30384301-20170518065010/@comment-30384301-20170523091917

Vergel Nikolai wrote:

PeaVZ108 wrote:

Vergel Nikolai wrote:

PeaVZ108 wrote: //I'll take that as a charge move. //One quick side note: Last time I was doing the same exact move (I even said "charging"), so that means I would have not applied the poison, hence not get attacked by the buckethead, hence suppose to have gained 2 charges by now. Do I really have to say "Saffron does a charge move" instead of giving a really quick side note on what I really am currently doing (example: "Saffron does x, meaning Saffron is charging an attack")? //Nope, charging and attacking are completely different moves. The poison activates when you attack (based on chance).But, you can charge in any way, as long as you state that it's a charge move. //But is charging literally "empowering your attack"? Like, in a real-time perspective, you back up your body then rush to a wall to increase the power of your collision. So I meant CHARGING my attack, not ATTACKING directly. In short, I was charging to build up my attack. My concern is when you just say "charging" it is just too plain for me. Usually, I detail out my action.

//Also, in the previous post, I was charging, not attacking nor doing both at the same time. Or wpuld you prefer to make me capitalize and turn the letters bold on the supposed action I wad doing? //Yes, basically charging increases your strength. You can still detail it out in however way you want, just make sure it's clear if you charge or attack.

I edited the template. I counted that charge I missed out. Thanks for telling me!