Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-25648422-20160320103109/@comment-1764483-20160320145524

Insert Your Name Here wrote: There's no use in having them as you said. Therefore there is no need to have them. Solid logic.

And how does "top tier" give them special distinction in this matter? Can you please give me one reason why we just axed a bunch of admins with little issue, yet struggle with this matter? Because admins are not top-tier. Let's look at the list, shall we?

Maybe we're talking about Hoanganhminh, RandomguY, and Shadythecat?
 * Founders are exempt, as are me, JemCel03, Milesprower2, Maxus Overlord, Someone456, and Starfruity.
 * Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls and MignightHawk said they wished to keep their rights to show their importance to the wiki, as per Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls's blog and this golden nugget by the latter: "I'm keeping [those rights] so the future of that wiki will know of what I have done, and that I did much more than just argue about nonsense. That I helped put the wiki into its golden age, and left to never return during the third dark age. From what it sounds like, [Wintermelon43] realized the same thing I did. That all you guys did was argue and cause drama. I think we are both glad now to be above the raging, flaming, and arguments over things that will not matter in a few years. Who knows, by the time my Dev project is done, the Wiki will be not even a thing of the past, but a blur. A string of absolute nothing." Jack also said that he wanted to keep those rights should emergencies arise.
 * Gregory Exploit's plan was to return after summer break it seems.
 * I want PvZBeast234 and AWPXML's inputs on this before we tamper with their rights.
 * Swampert rox is, in a sense, the pseudo-third founder.