Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170207035621/@comment-24863355-20170210004033

Legofan9o5 wrote: YammaYamer21 wrote: Camwood777 wrote:


 * Except, there's zero indication that they do, indeed, have differing genders. They're basically treated as a bunch of individuals with the same gender. Kinda like conjoined twins, if you would.

After a rule was hastily added to prevent so much as voting on it for 6 months due to how much bias against it there was, it really does become a concern that there's biased votes being made blindly when it comes to this topic.

Well, why aren't there people going around replying to every support with why they think they're wrong? And why is there a list of reasons that can't be used to oppose but no list for invalid supporting reasons, and users disqualifying "invalidly reasoned" opposes yet not supports like SuperGaming's? This thread as a whole is really damned biased, IMO, yet from what I can tell, Oppose still takes up the majority against the wave of Disqualifications.
 * Twin Sunflower's old Almanac entry said that one of them might be an evil twin, hinting that it is possible for multiple-headed plants to have different personalities. For confirmation, tell me how it's Threepeater's middle head that cheats, and not all of them.

Thank you. If a wiki is to assume it should take the assumption that follows the path of least resistance (in this case, it would be that the so-called "evil twin" is still the same gender.)
 * Still does not indicate a change in gender, and that assumption is just that, a massive assumption without any actual example in the game.

Also, I'm pretty sure that the proposal in this thread arranges for plants with multiple heads to be referred to as gender-neutral still unless proven otherwise.