Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20161030211121/@comment-25368137-20161103211938

Camwood777 wrote:

BF10 wrote:

Camwood777 wrote:

Light Bomber wrote:

Reapeageddon wrote: Reapeageddon wrote: Both chats are alive so what's the problem? Right now, both chats are dead.

If were gonna keep Discord, and keep PvZ Wiki chat, I think that...


 * If a mod gets demoted from Discord, if he/she is a chat mod here, I think he/she should be demoted as well, considering that both chats are sorta property of this wiki.


 * This is insane, but make it a requirement to chat on both chats, so the chats will as alive as the other chat, so we may chat peacefully as we chat on the two chats, otherwise... idk.


 * Also insane, but ban/kick/purge everyone who harasses other users for liking another chats. It's okay to say which chat you prefer, but don't be mean to people just because he doesn't like the chat you like.

EDIT: Please don't swear. ~ UPDATE 2: Maybe even the users who made the "Remove Discord" threads. The users who made?

hmmm...

So, Camwood, Snapdragon, Copper?

Alright so losing a Disc mod, an Admin and a normal user?

Seems legit Yes. Demote the regular user. That's obviously how staff positions work. Wait... you want to demote yourself?

The thread for it has ended. All drama related to it is now no longer tolerated and will result in demotion, then warning, then ban. Nuff said'.

Also, delete Discord drama content? No, I was kidding how a ban would require demotion, which it implied demoting a regular user. I obviously do not want a demotion.

Still, the fact you can't so much as mention the rule without breaking it is INCREDIBLY bad, and is going to need immediate remedy. I've understood the don't make drama (but this is still like one of the hardest things to do here), but the whole "never mention, never complain" is kinda dictatorial, right? I remember the reason Yappat voted oppose (OR something idk) was because it would be too dictatorial to just remove it because why not, hence, isn't there some controversy on making that other rule?