Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies Wiki Discussion/@comment-5797509-20140806180152/@comment-7150475-20140807002531

1Zulu wrote: Wintermelon43 wrote: Another thing is the Ice Ages rumour. It got us into HUGH ARGUEMENTS. Ninja, Manguel, and Zulu had a big fight. So, as an admn, I blocked them. for an hour. To stop the arguements. but, god forbid I give peace, Now People wanna demote me. COME ON, IT'S AN HOUR. YOU CAN FIND SOMETHING ELSE FOR A SIMPLE HOUR. SOME PEOPLE CAN'T EVER GO ON. SOME PEOPLE DON'T EVEN HAVE HOMES. AND YOU CRY AND SCREAM LIKE A BABY FOR AN HOUR OF NO-PVZ WIKIA? WOW. OH YEAH, AND IT WAS FAKE TOO. Fake fanon that looks real? that reminds us of......

'''That's not why I wanted you demoted. I recognized that I went over the line in that occasion, apologized for it, and fully accepted the one-hour block. What I did not like was your attitude towards everyone in that thread, and elsewhere.'''

FIRE PEASHOOTER! I GET CYYBERBULLYED FOR NOT BELIEVING IN A FIRE PEA. IN FACT, SOMEBODY SAID I'M RETARDED AND AN IDIOT FOR NOT BELIEVING IN IT. OH HOHOHO, DO I CALL MILES, PM, STARFRUITY, OR CRAZYOMBIE RETARDED FOR NOT BELIEVING IN GOD? NO. DO THEY SAY THAT TO ME FOR BELIEVING IN GOD? NO. THERE IS NO REASON FOR THAT. AND THERE'S NO POSSIBLE ANSWER TO IT. AND EVERYBODY HATES ME AND WANTS ME DEMOTED OVER A SILLY PLANT. DOESN'T IT REMIND YOU OF SOMETHING SIMILAR.......... Like..............

'''Well, you were pretty abrasive in that issue. It was clear the majority of the community wanted the Fire Peashooter to have its page for whatever reason (and it's something that I personally disagree with), but you unilaterally shut everything down with great prejudice. An admin should be able to keep things under control with firm but gentle intervention. '''

LASER BEAN! THE SAME THING HAPPENED. I HATED THE LASER BEAN, SO MILES HARRASED ME FOR IT. OH YEAH, AND I DID LIKE IT AFTER A WHILE. SO THEN, YEAH, SO MUCH RUDE COMMENTS

SPEAKING OF MILES, HE FRAMED ME CAUSE I LIKE PVZA AND DON'T WANT IT TO SHUT DOWN. COME ON, DEMOTION FOR OPINIONS ARE WRONG. THAT'S PROFF YOU'RE SCREWING US. I MEAN, SDO YOU WANNA OWN THE WIKI? WILL WE JUST, GIVE YOU A KEY? AND ALL OUR PASSWORDS? NO. WHAT DO YOU GAIN FROM IT?

'''I believe you handled the PVZA affair very poorly. Starting with an overly dramatic message in all-caps, and after that you deleted every message pointing out how obnoxious (and pointless) it would be to continue doing what you were doing.'''

AND OH YEAH, PEOPLE WANT ME TO DEMOTE CAUSE I ASKED QUESTIONS AND USED ABBREVIATTAIONS. JUST DEAL WITH IT. YOU CAN'T STOP IT.

'''I wasn't involved in that particular issue, but from what I saw it looks like you kicked someone out of the chat because you didn't like his rules. That's at the very least petty, in my opinion.'''

OBVISUALY, THIS WIKI IS RATIONIALLY SCREWED This post is another reflection of why I don't think you are fit for this position. First of all messages posted in all-caps are extremely obnoxious, which coupled with the overly dramatic tone of the message itself, shows conduct unbecoming of an admin.

You also need a thicker skin. As an admin you will be under greater scrutiny and more than likely people will be upset with you - sometimes for no reason. You need to handle criticism better instead of immediately flipping out and thinking everyone is out to get you. Most important of all: you need to take things less seriously. I honestly agree.