Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20160608023348/@comment-25648422-20160609005818

Camwood777 wrote: Pinkgirl234 wrote: Here is my ultimate response in regards to Camwood's reply here.

So today, I asked in Community Central regarding the avatar issue. And guess what? I was right from the very start! As long as you do not reveal any of the forbidden parts of your origin image, your avatar is purely fine. And that's a fact. One hundred percent fact. She practically has no say in this; like supporting your own promotion in a thread. If I have no say in this, why do you think am I talking in this thread right now? ...also, aren't you kind of a bit biased towards Pinkgirl? Seeing as you're one of her senpais...? Uh, I and Someone456's senpaiship has absolutely no connection with the point he proved.

So yeah. I made my point from the very start I posted in this thread. Your avatar won't constitute as ToU violation if you do not reveal any forbidden parts of the original image. Emphasis on Terms of Use, which is the overall rules of the entire Wikia.

And Camwood if I were you, please quit bothering me about my avatar already. I am sticking to the facts and the facts stand out the most. So if I like any NSFW songs, that shouldn't be your problem. It's my preference. It's my interests. I have been in Wikia long enough to know what avatars are considered violations of the Terms of Use. And plus 98% of our readers, even young ones, would care only for the main content and not any information about the editors who frequently edit the main content. With this thread made, the inappropriate avatars don't just cover kinky ones. They also cover degrees of major violence, offensive content and any of the like. It's like suggesting thay we ban users whose harmless-looking avatars are killer characters. Take Ben Drowned, Jeff the Killer, or Yuno Gasai for examples.

Plus I have been to Community Central with my current avatar and I wasn't even banned.

...again, huh...?

...you wanna give me a wall of text about how stupid and wrong I am, be particularly rude in the process, and hurt me again...?

...okay, fine... hurt me more...

...i've given up the will to fight back at this point... Am I personally attacking you here? No. I was merely trying to prove my point that my avatar is not a Terms of Use violation. In fact, let me quote the following quotes regarding this mater that strongly proves my point: ThisUsersLikesOreo wrote: Images are fine as long as they're not showing inappropriate body parts. If he just copied the face, it's fine, as there's nothing inappropriate there. Elemec wrote: Okay, so if i used a crazy villain on my profile pic, you would oppose me because i'm a psycho?

If i used a cropped suggestive pic, you would oppose me on my chat mod thread even though this has close to nothing to do with it? Itsleo20 wrote: How does a profile pic determine one's worth at a position?

So yeah. My avatar does not violate the Terms of Use and henceforth, I should no longer be bugged and bothered. Besides, if my avatar was really a big violation of the Terms of Use, I could have gotten a global block. Emphasis on global block. So to sum it up, my avatar does not violate the Terms of Use and therefore I ain't getting banned.