Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies Wiki discussion/@comment-3474455-20160120134516/@comment-26348973-20160120140630

Insert Your Name Here wrote:

Microphone DJ 125 wrote:

Insert Your Name Here wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

Insert Your Name Here wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

ThisUserLikesOreo wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote: I'm perfectly fine with this.. but there is one thing...

Rollbacks are made to counter VANDALISM. And we don't have much of that... Vandalism or no they still have to undo bad edits. "The Rollback button should not be used as a quicker alternative for the undo button".

Ok, that's not the exact text, but I tried. I do think that rollback has mainspace duty, so they should still try to make good edits while reverting bad ones. I do try to do it in public though instead of overusing rollback right, since the rollback will not show the undoing action in wikiactivity I never said that Rollbacks don't have mainspace duty. I just said that you can't judge a Rollback's suitability solely on whether the user uses the rollback right. We did not target SunShroom solely based on his usage of rollback right. He's made poor edits, he has a poor activity record and so on. We ensure that the staff members in question are throughoutly judged. In his promotion thread, did you vote support? I opposed. His work as an artist was inconsequential to his rollback duty, and when you see through it, you should notice that he did not do much in the first place. There was also a lot of blind voting back then, so much that someone had to purge a lot of them. Oh...