Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-25648422-20160320103109/@comment-3474455-20160320155212

Brainulator9 wrote: Insert Your Name Here wrote: There's no use in having them as you said. Therefore there is no need to have them. Solid logic.

And how does "top tier" give them special distinction in this matter? Can you please give me one reason why we just axed a bunch of admins with little issue, yet struggle with this matter? Because admins are not top-tier. Let's look at the list, shall we?

Maybe we're talking about Hoanganhminh, RandomguY, and Shadythecat? How do you even define "top tier?" How high is it? Does it automatically make you immune to the law? How does "psuedo-founder" make you immune to the law? If that is so, then that is a bad thing because justice is supposed to be fair to their subject.
 * Founders are exempt, as are me, JemCel03, Milesprower2, Maxus Overlord, Someone456, Starfruity, Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls, and MignightHawk.
 * Gregory Exploit's plan was to return after summer break it seems.
 * I want PvZBeast234 and AWPXML's inputs on this before we tamper with their rights.
 * Swampert rox is, in a sense, the pseudo-third founder.

And yes, the bureaucrats you mentioned are certainly candidates for demotion as they are not publically recognized as bureaucrats in the current list. This is also a part of the vote's subject, and can only be resolved if sufficient support is achieved.