Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-5143323-20180113035227/@comment-28270366-20180113071333

DatDramaPlant wrote: Vergel Nikolai wrote: OK. Regular user here. I think the point above really makes sense. Sometimes this democracy system in the wiki is what's weakening the site. I remembered seeing people voting support with a lackluster reason. Also,.some staff never gonna get to do their job right because stuff.

But I have a question. If we remove the voting system, how are we getting new staff if someone gets out/get demoted/gets banned? I believe you can nominate and the staff will vote?

I'm still very, very iffy about this. I don't see this working out at all, since this labours under the assumption that staff are perfect beings. The whole point on people voting subjectively still kinda applies to staff as well.

But if it's happening... at least I can influence the results, give a different opinion. Sometimes it feels like the staff are so... standardized. Everything is the same. At least... I have that.

This is not meant to be offensive to staff or anything btw.

I agree with Zombiecrab here. Is there no compromise? With the way we're doing it, it feels like staff are trying to seize power, despite everyone saying the contrary. It's just a gut feeling, so I have no reasoning or anything, but sometimes, I trust my inituition. It can be right despite having no reasoning.

Wow. The way you say that sounds like the Wiki's going full Communism, except there's no Communism, because you said staffs are trying to be superior, which is not Communism, and is not the case.

No offense. I'm always neutral. I'm not sure how the other users are gonna see a semi-communist wiki. Never knew the outcome, but nothing bad at trying, right?