Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-26239911-20160123135050/@comment-24275721-20160127175854

IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: Brainulator9 wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote Relevant video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWmVlgIR2HA&t=1m30s Argh, everybody seems to always disagree with me. Deka, Gold, you... Mostly because you an after a thing that was never there to begin with. Whether or not they make worlds after this, Time Twister is Modern Day and no one would disagree. If they still make worlds after this, that's good but just the fact that you're still bringing up Time Twister is very odd since most of its ideas were implemented in MD. That's what I was saying. I'm not saying I don't want more levels after this.
 * 1) Why would the time rift link to anything? It's a "tap-to-mess-with" effect like with the brains on a dish. Oh, you mean replacing it with something? Like what, the final boss? Wouldn't that go in Modern Day?
 * 2) So Time Twister would combine all the lawns' gimmicks? Wouldn't that nullify the point of Modern Day?
 * No, I'm arguing with you because I find your reasons to be bullcrap.
 * 1) This isn't about distribution, this is about hacking in order to find unused content.
 * 2) Pluralizing the statement doesn't matter. If I left it at a singular statement, it wouldn't have made a difference. Also, a classic example of ad hominem: rather than use more misinformed legal logic to refute my point, you just pointed out a trivial error.
 * 3) ...except that old content is no longer relevant. There could be multiple factors as to why a concept may be scrapped and never revisited: retooling, avoiding repetitiveness, lack of interest... do you not see the problems with reusing scrapped concepts?