Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-25083348-20151214185042/@comment-26825778-20151217123645

Rororoxor wrote: Coolyoyo33 wrote: Rororoxor wrote: Coolyoyo33 wrote: RetroBowser wrote: FioletowyWiewiór wrote: Master3530 wrote: I'm sure neanderthals were stronger than homo sapiens, but homo sapiens are more clever and have bigger brain. I don't even know if homo neandthertal is a grade before homo sapiens, cause they were living at same time, but whatever. Sunflower is weaker than her primal ancestor, but looks more clever, same for wall-nut and primal wall-nut. There's also other option that modern plants don't have to fight with strong jurassic gargs, bullies and zombies supported by dinos, so they became less powerful, due to no need for such a great power. In pvz1 that was enough. You think exactly like me. In original PvZ zombies were much weaker, so the plants didn't have to be strong like their primal counterparts.

Zombies would also be following the same principles. Only the strong zombies would survive, letting the weak die. There is no reason for the zombies to become weaker just as much as there is no reason for the plants to do so. Then please explain how everything in the past was stronger (not always) Like the biggest creatures lived during that time like the titanoboa or the megalodon. The newer stuff is just weaker, can you really say an 'evolved' boa is stronger than the titanoboa or a shark stronger than the megalodon? they were stronger and bigger because of the excess oxygen created by cyanobacteria. look at a picture of arthropleura. that was huge because of all the oxygen ik that, so so were the primal plants. Then why are they asking why the modern plants are more weaker they dont get that this is the evolution of living creatres, not freaking machines IKR