Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-1764483-20160131204339/@comment-24024415-20160201162007

Someone456 wrote:


 * How? How does inclusion of extra power for other users decrease message walls and notifications?
 * The tread here discusses how much weight a person has based on position. If a random user made a major change to the wiki, not everyone would be supportive of the change. If there are consequences and you are able to identify those consequences, that should be enough to sway users to opposition. Again, paraphrasing Brain9: we are all becoming more critical thinkers and blind voters will be challenged, critiqued and countered by opposition arguments.
 * So higher staff deserve more power because "they know better"? One example to prove this statement wrong: corrupt staff who care not for the wiki but for themselves. Give those people more power, because they know better than the uncultured normal user. That is now two assumptions now, as some normal users such as Cavia know the wiki very well. Just because a user is normal does not guarantee lower standards, nor does a person of high power guarantee high standards. So why should every person in their respective groups be treated as such?