Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare 1 & 2/@comment-5760976-20160301024459/@comment-27922460-20160326025233

CoachSDot wrote: Blake W. Mackinnon wrote: BucketPea wrote: Blake W. Mackinnon wrote: DatDramaPlant wrote: Blake W. Mackinnon wrote: hey guys,

who is harder to deal with?

real people online or AI players on crazy difficulty

because I remember kicking a** back when I was versing real people in gw1

but in gw2, AI's on crazy and hard difficulty had aim and other aspects that were so unparalelled

that I never seen before, I was baffled with how a** kicking the AI's were,

they were even worse than the try hards who got vanquish master & vanquish streak boasts everyday!

Do I just plain suck? censor, please. well, answer me! Is it the AI's on crazy and hard difficulty or do I just suck? CRAAAAAZY!! AI is hard. Hard is not as much. But I agree. Players in GW1 were weaker. '''GOOD! GREAT! GRANDE! Are gw2 players weaker or stonger the gw1?''' I'd say GW veterans are better than newcomers since in the first GW, there was no such thing as a HUB or solo play, you were shown the controls and thrown into the fray with no instructions other than "Win"

What I mean by this is that GW1 players had to train in multiplayer against other players, some are pros and others aren't team players. You needed to learn everything in live multiplayer, all of your strats, everything most players learned were in the battlefield, so they are most likely faster reactors and more skilled, but the true answer us up to the player's skill and adaptability on it's own.

I agree people that have played lots of multiplayer in GW1 should have lots of Skillz* in GW2


 * TM