Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-26583782-20161219202554/@comment-24024415-20161223225452

Mental Skillness wrote: It's never harmful to have a vote giving the bad parts of a thread.

so basically if my opposing is for the lols, I have to either support or not vote at all to not get blocked at all for having an opinion Yes it can be, when an opposition changes the meaning of the original thread to gain support for their side out of misleading information that is only slightly true. Take the phrase "Don't make mountains out of molehills", meaning people shouldn't hyperbole about certain aspects of something. THAT can easily be harmful, so yes, stating bad parts of a vote can turn out badly and have a negative effect on the vote.

You could have used neutral to show your problems without opposing. A much bigger problem is that your contribution to most votes is showing the negatives only and not a mixture of the two. It makes your opposition very weak and onesided, as your complaints neglect the opposition's benefits and just lead to a basically guaranteed oppose vote. You should integrate positives into your votes, even when your overall vote is opposing. It makes your votes stronger and much more realistic! Otherwise your carefree attitude and consistent voting pattern gives you a very "Troll-y" tone and overly satirical tone to everything you say, even when you should be more serious.