Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-4077536-20150508171749

Simple: should bureaucrats have veto power?

The veto power obviously couldn't be used for promotions, demotions and similar threads (whether it's the bureaucrat or any other user in question). It could be useful in certain situations where a suggestion wouldn't be realistically good for the wiki but would otherwise get a majority vote.

In that case, the thread in question would be 'delayed' for a few weeks or a month. Bureaucrats would get a new veto power every six months (or perhaps less?). Obviously, they wouldn't stack.

Vote,  or.

And I know many of you will say this would violate some sort of 'freedom of choice' or 'right to vote', but we wouldn't pick our bureaucrats if we knew they'd abuse their rights. It is the highest rank after all. 