Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-26239911-20160123135050/@comment-26942983-20160128013625

Brainulator9 wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote 1. Ok
 * 1) Yeah, which is what I'm debunking.
 * 2) Because it would be the same freaking world only with a different name?
 * 3) You have no right to dictate what's a good point or not. [[File:Oh.gif]]
 * 4) So in other words, you're saying that the audience is not permitted to give out spoilers unless the creator gives them out? Nice try, but when will the publisher tell you how the hero saves the day in the end of the story? Hints from the sequels, perhaps?
 * 5) That doesn't mean your argument wasn't an ad hominem. Let's say I was strawmanning by referring to one point as all your points. If that's the case, that still doesn't mean you actually debunked my point. How about refuting my point next time?
 * Oh, yeah, I should add to the list "lack of approval" since that's the case here.
 * 1) ...simple, you're defending yourself with poor logic.

2. MD is nothing like TT! TT would be way different. Different lawn, different gimmick, no new zombies&plants, much more dramatic...

3. So now I don't but you do huh?

4. It will never happen, but that's the way it's supposed to be!

5. The argument was faulty and that's that. Make a new one that isn't faulty.

6. You have your list, but you haven't given any reasons why anything is on the list.

7. No, it's because most people around here are negative. "Ooooh, end it now!"