Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170404034023/@comment-29611741-20170405022817

Birdpool wrote: YammaYamer21 wrote: AWikiBoy521 wrote:

YammaYamer21 wrote:

AWikiBoy521 wrote:

VeXJL wrote:

GamerNerd i wrote: Aren't we also putting games in the applications category? No, that would be redundant as not all apps are "games" to begin with. It's like saying that ".exe" are games when "executables" aren't games from the beginning. ... I do not follow at all. Birdpool has a point, it's just that....I am supposed to post this earlier, but I had to do some house chores earlier:

In other words, games is a category of "applications". There's like "book" apps, "entertainment" apps, and even some "smartwatch" apps. It shouldn't be hard to follow now that it's easier to understand. ... so it's pointless to put large over-arching categories because of micro-categories? Is that what you're saying? No, we're saying your argument is futile, lacking in logic and point. Well, you might as well be saying the solar's system uncle is a tomato. I wasn't making any argument; I was critiquing WikiBoy's. But I think I know what you two are trying to say, thanks to GamerNerd. This "Apps" category is just for all the non-game electronic applications, right?