Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies Wiki discussions/@comment-27138615-20170601190935/@comment-26488146-20170605002237

Zombiecrab wrote: Just saying, your rules seem like they may need a lot more work. One of the things that maybe should be added is a Mainspace requirement. Users could create a bunch of sockpuppet accounts, leave them inactive as sleepers for four weeks, and then leave a bunch of bad feedback on many staff members' evaluations.

Just a question, is there a rule stating that administrators and bureaucrats cannot give users warnings or blocks for giving them really negative but not rule-breaking feedback? Because maybe that rule should also be added, but at the same time, in the scenario above, the user nor any of the sockpuppets would suffer any repercussions for their negative feedback, if they cannot prove them to be sockpuppets, and any user who leaves really negative but not rule-violating feedback by focusing on one bad point, would be practically "invincible".

Oh, and also: Mental Skillness wrote: Teacup Terry wrote: how am i being evaluated better than anyone

who's idea was it to vote and say that I am a good discussion mod Oh don't take self pity.

I hate it when people do that.

Just asking, while you're complaining that you're getting good feedback, do you think I could leave bad feedback to make you feel better or..? Do you have to be so amazingly rude to EVERYBODY?