Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20170312225143

Yeah how predictable of me, me.

You know the gist, so let's get into this.


 * 1) Changing Staff Requirements: This one's a very bothersome one that I'm sure plenty of us have seen at least once. Usually, these get opposed because, well, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Yet these keep getting threads for voting on them anyhow? I honestly think we should've done this awhile ago.
 * 2) Policy Changes: Once again, another one that gets opposed for being an arbitrary over-complication, but yet evades the LPVs. Why's that a thing? Basically, this one gets posted time and time again, and is opposed time and time again, for the same reason of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", and yet we haven't put it in LPVs for some reason.
 * 3) Changing the kill/destroy/defeat pronouns: This one, I have never understood. Not even as a thread concept has it made much sense to me, to be quite honest. Yet every month, we see a vote on this, as apparently our previous setup just isn't good enough. However, I would like to mention that there'd be an exception here; this thread that was created too early to be properly voted on would instead be voted on in the proper 1 month gap after the last time we voted on it (which was indeed a week ago or so) instead of waiting an extra 2 months. However, after that, it's 2 months as normal.

Voting
Your voting key is this:

If you support one, use an S. If you oppose one, us an O. If you're neutral, use an N. 1, 2, and 3 all represent the topics, as you can see them listed at the vote. So, say you support adding the staff requirements/policy changes, but not the changing of the kill/destroy/defeat pronouns. In that case, you'd vote like this:

 