User blog comment:DatDramaPlant/Staff/@comment-27385163-20180113042228

You're right, staff don't have much control over everything, and we are still a fun-loving community, just because you can't actually have an opinion that can mechanically screw over other ones doesn't mean we're stupid robots that do nothing but act like a business.

In fact, if Staff have more arm room to do what they do, I think I can see a lot of good change. You do realize staff aren't robotic, they just want more arm room to do things? It's kind of hard that a few people match the same power as a staff member's ability, or hell, sometimes more.

Staff can't make a lot of major changes, now that's something practically UNHEARD of in any online forum. A community where staff aren't 100% in charge of changes? That's kind of alarming and seeing how toxic community can get, yeah this wiki is living proof that you can't apply a democracy to an online forum, because then people (like you) are going to call staff these dictators that are hungry for power and are no fun because you simply don't have the right to constantly make votes or get people on your side on a lot of things because they simply don't understand. Hell, we even had a vote greenlit for people just leaving empty blank neutral votes that mean absolutely nothing at all. People don't 100% know how to manage an online forum, and I think it'd be a lot more stable if staff were up to changes.

I think a lot of things should've been up to staff since 2013.

I think the concept of feedback, change suggestions and all that are nice, but votings for nearly everyone (voting requirements are rediculously low) is just not something I think belongs in a community like this one.