Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-25230228-20170308161849

I was thining about the thyme requirements for certain staff positions (namely Admin, which is like a year. No I'm not applying) and I had an idea. Let's add an age requirement. Hear me out.

The age requirements are based on the existing thyme requirements (as I remember them, do correct me if they were changed, but please be nice about it.)


 * Rollback: Must have been on the wiki for at least a month + 100 MS edits. Age requirement? 13 years + 2 months.
 * Content/Forum Moderator: Must have been here for 6 months. Age requirement? 13 years + 8 months.
 * Chatmod: Must have been here for (I think) 6 months. Age Requirement? 13 years + 8 months.
 * Admin: Must have been here for a year. Age requirement? 14 years + 6 months.
 * Bureaucrat: (I think) Must have been here for a year. Age Requirement? 14 years + 10 months.

The basic idea with this is to
 * Reinforce the whole "make sure new admins know WTF they're doing"
 * Reinforce the whole idea of "Don't run for the position as soon as you've got 1000 MS + have been here for a year you powerhungry jerk
 * Additionally, and the main point: Make sure we have more mature staff. I'm not saying who we have aren't mature, because they are, but this is just another layer of prevention.

What do you two guys think? dark, darker, yet darker...

If this passes, any staff that don't meet the requirement will NOT be demoted.

 