Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27138615-20170706081614/@comment-1764483-20170707222950

BF10 wrote:

Lets make a description:

ThePurplePi was a former discussion moderator on the wiki. He had many issues leading to his ban though including swearing and insulting other users. Either way we will still remember him.

or...

Slythern Potter, formerly NapalmRosalina was a former admin, known for power abuse and insulting, causing him to block. Even better, he also socked and gained rollback rights from it.

And HumpbackII will be:

HumpbackII was a former rollback and a sock of Slythern Potter.

See how hard it is to make descriptions of banned users?

Oh, don't forget WinterMagnet too. It's not hard if you know how to write from a neutral point of view. For example, "X user was a former staff member who made various contributions on pages about the Garden Warfare games, but after he was suspected of creating various sockpuppets to vandalize the wiki, he was demoted and blocked for X amount of time." Note how all of the given text is neutral and objective.

To YammaYamer21, isn't the point of the page to be purely historical? If that's the case, then that nullifies the whole business of such bias.