Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies Wiki discussion/@comment-3474455-20160120134516/@comment-4902297-20160120175444

Someone456 wrote: First of all we need to set more guidelines, the current one is too ineffective (If they haven't edited for three months, they may be demoted if the active administrators decide to do so.). The aforementioned rule should reduce the inactive time, and adding sth like the user doesn't use his right in certain period. The demoting rules need to be objective in order to be fair to all staff members.

Next step is making a thread. An then we can discuss more about the user's flaws, including quality of edits which is hard to set a standard in rules. I guess it's fair after the community has made the agreement. Well, we just need someone to do it, but people may be reluctant to do because of their friendship.

The thread reminds me that blind supporters' power is still a grave problem on this wiki.


 * 1) Didn't you see the thread about inactivity where we decided on 2-3 weeks? It's not enforced very well, but it was a rule decided upon nonetheless.
 * 2) I agree with this in theory, but in all honesty I don't see it happening with this community. We often give people way too many second chances, and we're often too afraid of giving criticism due to the risk of falsely labeling said criticism as an ad hominem attack or just generalrudeness
 * Yes, I completely agree. Unfortunately, there's not much that can be done that without drastic and controversial action.