Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies Wiki discussions/@comment-27138615-20170601190935/@comment-27138615-20170605053908

Zombiecrab wrote: Zombiecrab wrote: Just saying, your rules seem like they may need a lot more work. One of the things that maybe should be added is a Mainspace requirement. Users could create a bunch of sockpuppet accounts, leave them inactive as sleepers for four weeks, and then leave a bunch of bad feedback on many staff members' evaluations.

Just a question, is there a rule stating that administrators and bureaucrats cannot give users warnings or blocks for giving them really negative but not rule-breaking feedback? Because maybe that rule should also be added, but at the same time, in the scenario above, the user nor any of the sockpuppets would suffer any repercussions for their negative feedback, if they cannot prove them to be sockpuppets, and any user who leaves really negative but not rule-violating feedback by focusing on one bad point, would be practically "invincible". For the mainspace requirement, I was debating whether or not to put them since well, there are the social roles that don't really have to do with mainspace (especially discussion moderator where the general audience there doesn't even use mainspace), so I decided to extend the time needed to leave feedback to 4 weeks.

Offensive feedback can be removed, but the ones that criticize heavy flaws have to stay. Come to think about it, I never thought of that hole in the 4 week rule. If a mainspace requirement really needs to be added, probably keep it as 25.