Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-27769607-20160530030136/@comment-24760547-20160530170843

Camwood777 wrote:

If their grammar is terrible, that's still zero reason to oppose them. Sure it is. I've seen users that ran for office (metaphorically) and edited with horrid grammar, despite the reason for the edits actually being somewhat useful.

Now it's one thing if they're non native english speakers, (everyone makes mistakes) but if they are going for a staff position and are just being needlessly lazy regarding grammar quality, that's reason for opposal.