Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-25089892-20160309152500/@comment-24203813-20160318220522

Starfruity wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: Dekagamer7X9 wrote:

Gmanpizza wrote:

Dekagamer7X9 wrote:

IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote:

Dekagamer7X9 wrote:

Gmanpizza wrote:

TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: Notice how they put Garden Warfare 2 plants and zombies in PvZ 2 and PvZ:H in order to maximize hype. They really want us to play that mediocre shooter, don't they?

These games would be much better without the forced cross-game connectivity. All-star is nothing like the GW2 one, except for the name and Imp Punt. Ability wise nothing but just the fact that they decided to call it All-Star instead of the original zombie it was based on reeks of advertisement rather than a legit re-introduction of a zombie in a better sequel. Not to mention, if they are gonna introduce two GW zombies, why not introduce the new GW 2 plants in PvZ 2? PvZ: H has shown us that they can very well adapt Chinese plants in their game but they opted to use it for a spin-off rather than the legit sequel. Well the name All-Star Zombie sounds a lot cooler than Football Zombie. And besides, he is completely different than Football Zombie. Honestly, I have no idea why you are so salty about All-Star. Probably for the same reason I am. PvZ 2 is a sequel to the first game. However, instead of calling this returning zombie by the name it originally had, they decide to try and be consistent with the spin-off by calling it the name it has in that game. It doesn't make much sense, and there'd really be no reason for them to do that other than to advertise Garden Warfare. There's really no reason to call it Football Zombie, except for it's body sort of. Face it, All-star is nothing like Football Zombie! Plus, what's wrong with advertising? Do you hate GW2? Don't they have a right to advertise games that are made by them? No, I don't hate Garden Warfare 2 at all. I'd just rather they try and be consistent with the game that PvZ 2 is a sequel to, rather than trying to be consistent with a spin-off. It'd be like if they renamed Snow Pea to "Ice Pea" to stay consistent with Garden Warfare. But All-Star is not football zombie! Ice Pea and Snow Pea are the same, but All-Star is different. Those two zombies are completely different, because if they kept old football zombie it would be so lame! Sure, they may function differently, but look at them. There's no denying they're the same zombie. Show a side-by-side comparison of them to someone who doesn't play Plants vs. Zombies games, and they'll tell you they're the same zombie. It's the same case as Cactus. Just because they function differently doesn't make them different characters, and doesn't make them a different entity. Would you say that Cactus and Balloon Zombie in PvZ 2 are completely different and not the same character? No. Football Zombie and All-Star are and always will be the same zombie, just with a different name. Weren't you the one who wanted to separate them??? They may be the same zombie, but they function differently so should be separated. Same deal with Cactus, but no one sees this logic. ^^^