Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20160319001047/@comment-7091122-20160319014613

Gargantuar333 wrote: Camwood777 wrote: Gargantuar333 wrote: Camwood777 wrote: ...you didn't read the whole thread, didn't you?

...ah well, i'm used to pretty much nobody listening to me. This template covers the entirety of scrapped and unused content, and concepts, therefore eliminating the need for a new template for a subject that is already covered. It's the fault of the reader that it gets confused with scrapped content, not the template's fault. The template does its job just as its supposed to. Do you want seperate templates for scrapped and unused content? Please elaborate. I will admit that your template does look pretty good though. I think there should be separate templates for scrapped/concept-related concept and unused concept, considering the distinction. And the issue is, we don't have the scrapped template on any of our current pages for unused content. None of them. It's grown it's stigma of being for concepts, not for unused content. Heck, I didn't even know it was for unused content as well until I read it.

And because I can only reply to one post, Brainulator, I think that's archived, but there's a "Removed" template that works for that, but has only been used on pages for PvZ:AS. Thanks for the clarification. So what we should  probably  vote on is whether or not we edit the template to make it relevant, or whether or not to seperate and create another template for unused content. I would recommend changing the name of this to "Seperating unused data and scrapped content", or something of the sort. I mean, it's your voting thread, it's all up to you, but just so we can understand exactly what you want done, I would propose the name change. That's basically what I was asking for; a split from concept/scrapped content and unused data. Sorry, I have social anxiety, I am horrid at explaining my thoughts.