Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20160626043633

'''NOTICES: I mean no offense to any of the people listed here, pretty much everyone here has either helped the wiki and/or been kind enough to me enough for them to have at least a shred of respect in my heart. In addition, this isn't a voting thread, so don't bother voting if we demote/don't demote someone. Anyway, with that...'''

I've noticed there are quite a few staff members that have dubious amounts of activity across the wiki, which makes me question if they deserve to retain their status as staff, or at least to the certain extents they do.

{{U|Piotrek1113}
I've hardly seen him in mainspace, chat, forums, blogs, etc. at all lately. I know it's just rollback, so demoting might be a little bit excessive, but I don't know why he's still staff given his activity.

However, this guy doesn't really baffle me as much as the next guy, which is...

Now, BEFORE you get your pitchforks and throw them at me, let me just say he has my respect and all. He has made the most edits to this wiki... but has is the key word here. I hardly EVER see him on mainspace. Okay, that's an understatement... I've pretty much NEVER seen him on mainspace. Heck, I hardly ever see him on chat or the forums.

The only times I see him, he's either just silently closing/moving/highlighting threads, or near Pinkgirl. Which, granted, the former can be nice, but we have enough discussion mods at this point for it to not be too much of an issue... And I will only say as much as that for the latter, out of Rule of Cautious Editing Judgement.

How does he retain b-crat? I'm not asking this in a rude way, before you ask, I'm more confused, than anything... I've never seen him actively editing in the mainspace ever in the (almost) 5 months I've been here.

You might say, "well, he's still active here, so--" but, counter argument, majority of the activity I've seen of him is just related to the forums. Why not keep his discussion mod, maybe content mod, rights, but remove the admin/b-crat rights, seeing as he hasn't used those in any form of meaningful way within recent history?

Now, that's just me throwing those ideas out there, and I'm not 100% sure if it's the right thing to do. I'm still learning, as far as I am concerned. But, I'm still very confused that Someone456 keeps his high staff status, even though his activity here has been a huge slag.

Conclusion
Reminder, this isn't a voting thread! This is more of a, "hey, did you notice this? what's up with that?" thread. I also want to remind you I mean no ill-will to the users here, I'm just confused at their staff status compared to the edits they make.

What do you think of this? What do you make of it? Just share your personal thoughts here. 