Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-27769607-20160530030136/@comment-24760547-20160531005421

Camwood777 wrote: Gargantuar333 wrote:Camwood777 wrote: If their grammar is terrible, that's still zero reason to oppose them. Sure it is. I've seen users that ran for office (metaphorically) and edited with horrid grammar, despite the reason for the edits actually being somewhat useful. Now it's one thing if they're non native english speakers, (everyone makes mistakes) but if they are going for a staff position and are just being needlessly lazy regarding grammar quality, that's reason for opposal.And? You're acting like we can't just fix the grammar ourselves. Like them editing suddenly locks the page, and we can no longer go back and fix their grammatic errors. I've done entire edit sprees about fixing improper usages of "it's", so it's* not impossible. *that wasn't intentional, but i kept it inOf course we're going to fix it, like I said everyone makes minor mistakes, but if bad and lazy grammar usage is consistent with that user in particular, that is a fine reason to not support a promotion.