Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-26583782-20161219202554/@comment-24024415-20161223232554

YammaYamer21 wrote: Legofan9o5 wrote: Mental Skillness wrote: It's never harmful to have a vote giving the bad parts of a thread.

so basically if my opposing is for the lols, I have to either support or not vote at all to not get blocked at all for having an opinion Yes it can be, when an opposition changes the meaning of the original thread to gain support for their side out of misleading information that is only slightly true. Take the phrase "Don't make mountains out of molehills", meaning people shouldn't hyperbole about certain aspects of something. THAT can easily be harmful, so yes, stating bad parts of a vote can turn out badly and have a negative effect on the vote. First, that statement is usually BS IMO. It can easily be turned against anything that has a few complaints, and sometimes one seemingly small detail could actually mean the difference between a good idea and a bad one. Secondly, FFF doesn't use misleading or partially true information... Give me an example of an oppose with such a barely true statement.

I was saying how giving "bad parts" can become hazardous, in response to FFF's position on how it "Never harmful". I did not say that he himself used such tactics before, but that they exist and that ignoring that vary real possibility is a very problematic way of thinking.

Heh, you know what? It seems that's my example: he made the possibility of a harmful opinion smaller than what it could be in order to garner sympathy. That's a perfect example of exaggeration to make his side better. So yeah, he definitely did use such a statement.