Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-27385163-20170527235032/@comment-27385163-20170528042131

Camwood777 wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote: you've simply repeated yourself with claims i disproved

1. it's not derailing, it's relevant, the people who responded made it derailing.

2. i'm just stating a problem with the wiki, silencing me due to that is a breach of freedom of speech. you quite literally just said "if we dont like it, we delete it". which in itself is an abusive system.

and you're basically now trying to belittle the situation by flatering yourself, and making everyone think i'm trying to provoke you, which isnt how the world works. heck, i could say that these warnings and reply removals are attention towards me, and are trying to provoke me. Firstly, if you have an issue with me repeating myself... That's because you're not getting the point of my statements.
 * 1) I flat-out told you why the people reacting weren't the ones derailing, and why I can't just warn everybody reacting. Simply put, that's literally against the rules, and against how warnings for derails work. If a thread derail occurs, you don't punish the people reacting to it, you punish the person who derailed. Yet, you continued to not understand. So I said it again, and... I'm now wrong because I repeated my statement?
 * 2) As I've stated numerous times, freedom of speech =/= freedom of consequence. I don't really get why this is such a hard concept to grasp. You can say anything, but you're not free from the consequences of what you say. If you want an example, just go in public and just randomly say the N-word at random intervals; you'll see what I mean very, very quickly, implying you're in an urban or suburban area.

The thing is, I wouldn't need to repeat myself if these statements were actually understood.

There's not going to be an exception to the fact that wiki rules say you warn the person who derailed, not the people who reacted to it, so no, I'm not going to remove the warning and give warnings to everyone else who reacted to your warning, and no, your derailing posts being deleted is not "censorship" and it is not "protected by freedom of speech."

If you have an issue with me repeating myself... maybe don't make me have to repeat myself. 1. but, my posts were on-topic?? and you can warn multiple people, there's no limit to how many people you can warn. and no (to you saying you're wrong for repeating yourself), it was because i already countered it, and i didnt want to repeat myself.

2. but removing replies because of an opinion that thinks negatively about something you may possibly appreciate and know easy to abuse, or basically indifferents to what you think is a breach on freedom of speech.

drama is an extremely easy to profit from with corruption.

and like i said, i didnt derail, you're saying that. they derailed the conversation, not me. the topci was the pvz community, and drama is a huge flaw in the pvz community. they were not derailing, or tried to invoke a negative reaction.

and even when i tried defending myself and saying it was unfair, they were deleted with no response or argument. this is a breach of censorship, since a lot of people made it really clear that they didn't want to talk about flaws just because?? and because my posts thought differently, they were deleted.

and they were obviously censored lmao. you guys provided no argument to what i said and simply deleted the posts straight-up. which in itself is power abuse, and i dont feel like people should get away with that