Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-9944069-20160208000719/@comment-1764483-20160208203750

Piotrek1113 wrote: Well... Many of you are right. But I don't like to repeat the opposes/supports. When the vote is satysfying (like BUL9's comment about seperating plants/zombies), then we can use "per". Or should I make "copy-paste" of the right vote or write the same thing, but in other words? "Pers" could be used, only when the vote is fully explained. That's exactly the problem: they'll still parrot their opinions regardless. It'll just be more hidden because of this. Sure, they'll have to think about what they're saying a bit more, but it's like you're trying to weed out all mindless votes. In fact, a lot of these "per" votes are not because of parroting but because of agreement, since re-explaining those reasons would make the thread a broken record.

Wikipedia still allows "per" votes, for that matter.

Also, it seems that the Blitzer thing was dictated by wiki rules: the name "Berserker" was never in the game.