Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-27053902-20170316035222/@comment-6031945-20170324023507

I think we should stop "that discussion" now. Strikethrough are sometimes used whenever the post think that the readers wouldn't care about such text and if you don't like strikethrough texts, ignore them or just keep it to your head instead. I'm no staff but I notice that discussions like "this" are getting repetitive on those "Update Discussions" lately...

Snapdragon717 wrote: I feel like I'm the only one who prefers PvZ2 as a f2p than a paid game. Namely because you still get the game, but FOR FREE. Plus, I find no point in buying premiums or upgrades for myself, so there's that. Unlike a game like Candy Crush where it takes years to pass two levels without paying a dime, PvZ2 is still beatable without paying anything. You're not alone. For a user that literally uses nothing but Lvl 1 plants (unless I'm forced to use that Peashooter and Wall-nut), I agree with that as imo, it just makes more revenue due to the ads (which is not that much compared to other freemium games) and...overpriced stuff rather than it being "paid" and having overpriced stuff. Heck, I like that game so much that I literally wanted to support the devs even if it's "overpriced" (although, I can't since Googol Play Cards aren't available on my country). (again, that text is like "that" to make it consistent with something that not much users care about)