Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27744487-20160413182128

My first idea is that when a vote succeeds (When a new feature happens like a new template or a massive change in articles) that if there is confusion under 1 week after the vote happened that the changes will be reverted (Big confusion, not one user.)

Second idea is a change to the voting rules. Example: User has 10 mainspace edits, but has been on the wiki for a year. I think that people who have been here for more than a year, but don't have enough mainspace edits should be trusted, spam couldn't possibly happen like this, unless a vandal wants to wait 1 year for 20 accounts so he can spam supports or opposes.

You know the drill.

 