Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2: It's About Time/@comment-24922984-20150522195938/@comment-24275721-20150523200502

Мит бой wrote: Stuff 1. there's so many interesting combos with plants anyway, why we need more?

Do you even realise what you're saying right now or are you just plain dumb? The combos exist because of the number of plants in the first place! The more plants means more variety of combos (with the keyword being VARIETY). With more arsenal we can find even better strategies day by day. You really do seem to lack common sense, don't you?

2. I mean, yes, It would be nice to have more plants, but they seem doing fine without it.

Read above.

3. we don't need many plants because we could have enough fun with these.

There's nothing called "these". The term only exists because of the number of plants. If the game had only AE plants then you wouldn't be saying this in the first place. Just since there are over 30 plants, you can say that you're having fun with them. With more plants, you'll be able to get even more fun than that and have an even better time with the game.

Bottomline, the game needs variety and with a name like this: "Plants vs Zomvies", we need more plants, so that by your own logic, we'll be able to get fun. Again, you seem to be staggering a lot coming up with valid counter arguments. Are you really sure you're not a blind fannboy?