Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-27138615-20160529185435/@comment-25648422-20160530144652

Zambiealex wrote: Pinkgirl234 wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

Camwood777 wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Camwood777 wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Zambiealex wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Zambiealex wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote: Before I place my vote though, allow me to say that Hige's avatar did not seem kinky. It seems to merely depict someone just gasping happily. I don't see how it's sexual. It does not even look like a Terms of Violation. Besides, I think the perfect to complain is when someone uses an avatar that shows a completely nude woman. Emphasis on "completely nude".

That's sort of avatar is what you can say a Terms of Use violation. Slow down Pink! That was a kinky photo he cropped and posted. What's kinky about gasping? :V When I was going on Google finding PVZ pictures I came across a very inappropriate pvz pic. I left it and I forgot about it. Then Hige came across it and cropped it. The thing it's not a Terms of Use violation though. It showed only a face that could mean different meanings but it's no ToU violation. How exactly is... Can I say it? Promise you won't give me a warning for saying what it is? Is what? Make sure to censor any swear word you might use. Here goes... Don't say I didn't warn you. I censored all the "inappropriate" words, so while some aren't "swears", they are kinda not for kids.

It was a female conehead zombie with a p**** (us internet users savvy with the f****hs online call these f******i, or just f****s), getting a b*****b from a Peashooter.

Don't warn me, it was Hige who made it the icon, not me. It's fine, she's probably used to it. No surprise. I found out what the whole image was before you even said that. So yeah, I knew about the image where a Conehead Zombie was having a "really good time" with a Peashooter. I showed it to you. Just  block him or something. That's not up to me to decide. It's up to an administrator to decide.