Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-26895425-20150310111157/@comment-24295040-20150311002943

Starfruity wrote:

DeathZombi wrote: 65 percent is way too low for adminstrator, which is the second highest position anyone can be granted in this wiki. That's a D average. Its like getting an assistant manager job and you are barely 65% qualified for the job, which is not good. Why not do it by a grading scale? Bureaucrats need an A- rank of 90 percent supportive votes, Admin with 80 percent or better, Forum Mods and Chat Mods in the C range of percentages and Rollbacks with at least 60 percent, with a D. D is the lowest passing grade in American schools, and since Rollback has the least power, well they relate. However some will disagree or agree. There might be a flaw in this but hey, this is just a suggestion. A wiki suggestion! (I swear no one will get this reference.)

Back to the thread. I vote 2, since it is the highest percentage up there, and so far the most reasonable. Like Pepsicola said, Admins require a high amount of responisibility as you are showing others how to be leaders. Our former "famous" leaders, one was disrespectful and irresponsible and the other had issues with other users. Is that leadership and showing responsibility? No. The only time I would follow those two if I want some disciplinary punishment with a huge block time. That is fun, right? Right? Of course not. Vote 2. You're always the one making all the big speeches about what side you support.

Is that something good or bad?