Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170207035621/@comment-7091122-20170210033110

YammaYamer21 wrote: Camwood777 wrote:

YammaYamer21 wrote:

Camwood777 wrote:

YammaYamer21 wrote:

Camwood777 wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

{{Disqualify|There's no proof to say that they CAN, or that it's POSSIBLE, either. Literally none. If there's no proof to say it can't, or that it's impossible, then don't use that as your main basis.

Also, you're the one who mentioned the whole "game =/= species" and "every wikia does it, it's standard" arguments. Not Pinkgirl. She didn't even speak a word related to either of them, yet you use that as a reason to disqualify a disqualification that doesn't use that either. If it bothers you that much, then make it a reason for your vote. Not for disqualifying a disqualify for a vote with completely unrelated reasons.

You don't disqualify a disqualify for vote A that used B as the reason for disqualification, with the reasoning that B is invalid because of reason G. It's unrelated entirely.