Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-11660317-20170201093426/@comment-1764483-20170204154040

But first...

This thread was just pointless. The fact that the original poster did not cite any specific factual evidence and expected us to take our word that he's a "nerd" or "genius" (the latter in a condescending tone) combined with an overall passive-aggressive attitude towards transgressions done on a completely different website which we officially disconnected from the actual website makes it clear to me that the whole impetus for this thread is out of spite more than actual relevant wrongdoing on the topic's end. Don't just expect us to know what you're talking about beforehand: discuss who he is and what he did wrong and if applicable, why it was wrong. Concerning I've been the victim of a nebulous demotion thread in the past, what makes you think that ad hominems are valid reasons as to why he should be demoted? If it's not common knowledge, you need to have sources; otherwise, said information is as good as bunk.

Good day.