Board Thread:Fun and games/@comment-5760976-20160115014148/@comment-24203813-20160119011951

Dracotroll564 wrote: Dekagamer7X9 wrote:

Dracotroll564 wrote: Ok.Lets all agree.Twin Sunflower's a$$ was kicked by moonflower.Lets compare....

Moonflower:4 of these together for 200 sun

Twinflower:4 of these for 500 sun.Seriously?

Moonflower:powers up other plants

Twinflower:just sits there.

Moonflower:Extremely poor PF abilty.Only prouces its regular ammount of sun and makes a weak sheild.

Twinflower:250 sun.Yep.

Altogether,Moonflower killed Twinflower.Moonflower is OP in endless.300 les sun for 4 of them.Moonflowers only disadvantages are Its recharge and PF ability. And unless you put all 4 moonflowers next to each other, the sun output isn't the same. Moonflower's okay, but you need a group of them to be useful. Twin Sunflowers are useful alone. They produce 100 sun each, while Moonflowers produce 25 sun each unless other shadow plants are nearby. So no, Moonflower doesn't "kick Twin Sunflower's a$$", they're both good plants that have their pros and cons. One's not "better" than the other.

Well technically moonflower is better via sun cost and powering up plants,and Twinflower is better via plant food.So yea...

It has a lower sun cost, but once again, it needs to be planted within range of other Moonflowers to be useful. One row of Twin Sunflowers produces a total of 500 sun. One row of Moonflowers produces a total of 325 sun (3 of them produce 75 each, and the other 2 produce 50 each). With Moonflowers, it's all about placement, while with Twin Sunflowers, it's about producing a lot of sun. I'll still use Twin Sunflower over Moonflower any day, as I need space for attacking and defensive plants, and in order to have efficient Moonflowers, I'd need 2 rows of them. And I only need one row of Twins. I still use Moonflowers in conjunction with with Shadow Plants though.