Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-3398859-20170629222924/@comment-26239911-20170703205832

Camwood777 wrote: Since you asked for a chronology, here it is.
 * 1) TheO casts their original vote
 * 2) It is disqualified
 * 3) TheO changes their vote
 * 4) AWB tallies the votes, and does not count is, claiming it is disqualified. However, he does not use the template, and his reason given is not a valid reason.

Neither was it stated that the default for split votes such as that is 0.5. Not to mention, most votes (with the exception of neutrals and support-neutral/neutral-oppose) count as 1 vote. Since 1 is the standard metric, and 1 has been used for split votes such as SSU's in the past...

In the old thread BF10 linked, I did a similar thing by attempting to disqualify votes I thought were going off wrong ideals. It didn't work, and resulted in a rule being added stating you cannot do that. I recognize this was wrong, but I still did it, and I apologize, but that's irrelevant. I assume you'd already know you can't disqualify votes you feel are "wrong" or disqualify votes to make a result you want, however, because you posted in that thread. What? But it went like this:
 * 1) TheO voted;
 * 2) TheO changed his vote;
 * 3) TheO's vote was disqualified.

Well, I think that we should clarify that up in another thread then.