Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-25029082-20160302155927/@comment-26826553-20160313122651

DatDramaPlant wrote: The Ancient Pult Ancestor wrote: DatDramaPlant wrote: The Ancient Pult Ancestor wrote: See DDP? The guy you are defending is a crooked trickster. He said he was innocent, eh? How can you explain that (above)? Coincidence? It ain't no coincidence. Yes, you have no proof that it isn't a coincidence. *folds arms* Unless I have solid proof, I have no reason to believe that he tricked us. And even then, considering that he was blocked AFTER a vote won for him getting unblocked, I personally think that he SHOULD have the right to make sockpuppets. And how can you make sure that he's being sincere?

 He may be acting nice in one PC while spawning the socks in another.

We also have no proof that he's actually Mr. Nice Guy now *snaps fingers*

And no, making sockpuppets is still rule-breaching, so yeah, saying he has the right to make socks is like saying you support of his rule-snapping. MaxStories.

What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? Assume good faith... Best to keep neutral. Sure, no proof that he's a devil, but no proof that he's an angel either.