Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-33574414-20170818154428/@comment-27385163-20170901174715

BF10 wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote:

BF10 wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote: i personally think it's justified if it's used as an argument finisher

not as just "you're a crappy editor"

i mean perhaps it's kind of small to report on, but i didn't expect to be called a crappy editor in a blog that hardly relates to mainspace activity.

and i didn't expect that from a b-crat, of all people. perhaps he was tyring to be funny, but BF10 and i have kind of a history, so i doubt he made his words out of fun and games. First thing in the morning then I see this.

When I mean by "crapper editors" I mean those that doesn't make stuff correctly like File:Feastivus imp.png. I'm not calling you crap and I won't do such thing.

Really you need to learn your English. i should be telling you that, because that could definitely be interpreted in different ways, and even then, you're arbitrarily calling my work crap, now.

wonderful.

either that, or you just don't understand that the blog's HDs are original. No I'm not! I just typed it grammarly incorrect. I don't think your work is crap and if you think I still think they are, there must be somethig wrong with you. but didn't you just say i was the one who misunderstood and made the mistake.

and, i really don't think you think my work is crap, considering i bring over 500 pixel HDs to the table while you guys have less than 200 pixel HDs. also "there must be something wrong with you". you like ending anything you say with a remark that arbitrarily belongs. i havent even responded and you're assuming i'd still think you think my work is crap.

anyways, let's just get off this topic, it's not really all that important at this point.