Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-1764483-20160131204339/@comment-24024415-20160201164224

Someone456 wrote: ...My votes have reasons, and other users may agree with them, they're not blind... You're idea assumes that everyone voting with you know what you're trying to say. Do people blindly vote for a topic? Yes. Do people blindly vote against a topic with influence of another user? No? Well, why not? 

Laziness of a user makes them blindly vote. "Ehh, this person's vote looks solid, I'll vote with him. He's a powerful user after all".

Could the argument of the powerful user in this case be fraudulent? Yes.

Did the user not care for the quality of the vote or the effects it would have on the wiki? Yes.

Would this be considered a blind vote on the grounds of voting without thinking of implications or errors present in the notion being followed? It should.