Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-5939269-20160504224254/@comment-5939269-20160506193437

Zambiealex wrote: Protanly wrote: Zambiealex wrote: Protanly, I know you want to get these right easily. How so? Based on feelings? Based on distrust? You can provide no logical rationale that says as such. If I wanted to get them "Easily" I would go ahead and make 500 more edits to pages that really don't need em, acquire my rank and never edit again since it simply wouldn't be in my interest to make such useless edits. If I wanted to get them "Easily", I would have raised such a discussion a lot earlier considering I've been in my staff position for as long as I have.

If you aren't going to contribute anything meaningful, then don't waste your own time making a post when it is clear that you have not read any arguments I have raised, and certainly have not even tried to raise any of your own. Darling, Darling. It would make complete sense if a Bueracrat or An Admin made this thread. Oh and I have made good contributions and you just say don't waste time. DOES IT LOOK LIKE I have time to read your "Statement".

They call this Tough Love. What contributions have you made to this thread aside from vague assumptions about my character and integrity?

I'll have you know that I'd be making this thread no matter what my rank was here on the wiki. If I see an issue, I am going to raise it. Are words spoken by a fool any less true? The answer there would be no.

Like I said, if you aren't going to bother reading the comments in this thread, then you shouldn't bother posting to what I idealized to be a civil conversation on the ideas of rank changes, expanding on the recent chat moderator change that took place. My arguments towards the subject have validity. It'd be a lot more positive towards all of us, as well as yourself if you took the time to address those with your views.