Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20170617134530/@comment-27385163-20170619074953

DatDramaPlant wrote: Mental Skillness wrote: look it is completely pointless, a dictator MAKES the rules, so that rule would mean nothing if this ever turned into a dictatorship, and if this applies under b-crats, power abuse rule exists. completely pointless. Actually to become a dictator you have to remove the rule first, not become a dictator first then remove the rule...

But I see your point.

Also if Jack made the vote to remove it instead of Cam making the vote to re-add it, the percentage swaps and suddenly the winning side changes. This is why I still don't really like the 65% rule, but eh, no one cares about my opinion lol wait, dictatorship is about the people too?

and like i said, the wiki would never shift to that position, because if that rule is broken by the upper b-crats, i think almost no one can stop them, because there is no one higher to demote them

the rule is simply pointless