Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-30790899-20170627133133/@comment-30790899-20170703194457

VeXJL wrote: Teacup Terry wrote:

VeXYBot wrote:

I'd like to add that I find you childish at times, and even pessimistic, so I won't say your behaviour is "perfect". I'm even more childish and pessimistic. Why not oppose me?

I really don't get why you absolutely hate being a rollback. If anything, it's a privelege. He hates it becauae he isn't very active on MS and when he is he doesn't use the rollback button. He took it because it was a good starter position.

As a chat mod, I do hope you won't do the same as a chat mod: "I hate being a chat mod. Chat's way too ded." I doubt it.

Even a quick search through staff evaluation forms (truly sorry for bringing this up) will show that your behaviour isn't as tolerable as lots of people here say. In what way? Personality wise, he's perfect- nice and mature but willing to be serious. Rollback wise, see the second thing I said. I'm pretty sure I did mention that you are pessimistic, Terry. I supported you for other reasons. I do recall a blog titled "I should end this now" or something of the sorts. Just the fact that he complains a lot about being a rollback makes him quite immature, if you haven't noticed. I'm not saying he's not serious or nice at times, but he shows pessimism a lot in certain areas. Complaining about a "job" (because it sort of is a job) is what a child does, hence "childish".

Be reminded that chat mod is also a starter position. It is an alternative to rollback, for those who are active in chat, but not mainspace. That point is invalid. He should've gone for chat mod in the first place if he doesn't like mainspace. It has the same exact requirements.

Finally, you haven't even addressed the fact that he's not that active on chat. Just... LOOK. He has not been on chat for practically half the month of June, and he's not active even outside of vacation. Well, I thougt 125 edits were needed for chat mod. If I knew that, I would have done so.