Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-5939269-20160919170459/@comment-27037991-20160920051323

InsertSun wrote: Okay, I'll just list my thoughts and opinions, not that they matter...

General

Questions should be asked and answered regarding each position. For example, for rollback, "Are these edits constructive? Do they show any exceptionallity? What about the activity?" For discussion mod, for example, "Do they go on differing boards? Is activity good?" Just some examples.

Rollback

Rollback should be kept, and the same number of mainspace edits. However, maybe decrease it to 90? However, then we may have too many users trying to get the rights. I do agree the any staff above rollback should have the rights, to promote mainspace activity.

Pretty sure it already is...

Rollback Alternative

Should be 2 weeks.

Discussion Moderator

I would still keep a mainspace requirement, however make it 100. They also should have chat moderator rights before running.

Agreed.

Agreed.

Content Moderator

Agreed.

Agreed.

Administrator

Due to admin being an "all-around" right, they should have atleast some mainspace skills. I'd say around 750-900 mainspace edits.

3 months is too low, it should be around 4 months for a fast pass, 6 not.

Bcrat

Should be atleast 1,500 mainspace, as with admin.

Agreed, but keep the mainspace. Discussion mod comes with chat mod rights.

Anyway I'll cast my vote.