Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-9944069-20150707152003/@comment-25230228-20150707192344

Brainulator9 wrote: RetroBowser wrote: If Hitler was just a staff member on wikipedia who banned many accounts for being a certain way, I don't think they would have a problem not needing to give him a place on a page and instead allow it to stay urban legend.

The only reason Hitler has a page on wikipedia is because wikis are a source of information on that topic with wikipedia being very broad on the topics it covers, Hitler being needed inclusion due to his involvement in WW2, and Nazism.

The comparison is slightly flawed due to being an appeal to extremes. That is true. I'm just saying that they still have a lasting impact on the wiki. I was simply making a point, what if we went through the former staffs, and found one that was like. "We'd rather not remember that one..."?