Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-3474455-20151119123038/@comment-4009269-20151120212716

RandomzSunfish23901 wrote: Starfruity wrote: TheHandsomePlant wrote: Starfruity wrote:

TheHandsomePlant wrote:

Starfruity wrote: This isn't a debatable issue. Since they are separate zombies they follow the standard separation rule of more than two differences, which they both have. They will both get their own page. We are still allowed to make exceptions, just like we did with Cactus. Cactus is the same plant in two games with a completely different purpose, so it is debatable. Since Jurassic Gargantuar is a completely different zombie from Gargantuar, it isn't debatable. It's just the rules, we can't make exceptions for everything! We made these separation rules to avoid votes like this from happening. But Gargantuar and Jurassic Gargantuar are the same zombies with completely different purposes too, the adjective "Jurassic" have nothing to do with zombie itself. They are considered separate zombies as far as the game's logic goes. We know that they are all technically Gargantuars, but canonically they are separate zombies.

Plus, they aren't completely repurposed either. For the sake of argument let's say Jurassic Gargantuar and Imp are not from Jurassic Marsh, but actually the standard Gargantuar and Imp in PvZ3. They have different stats, but they still smash plants and throw Imps, just like previous Gargantuars. Since it's a separate game and they are canonically the same, they are debatable as to whether they should share a page.

In the actual situation however, they don't have a connection to each other, so they should only be able to share a page if they are similar enough, which we have deemed to be zero or one differences. I thought you clearly stated they need THREE differences. JG has only two. -_ - If I said that, it was an accident. This thread is unnecessary, and to follow wiki standard it should be closed. I'm really not happy about how things are being run around here lately...