Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20160608023348

'''NOTE: This thread contains SOME more... sensitive content, and unfortunately there's no way I can really express these things properly without having to say them. Inappropriate words HAVE been censored, but I will still only be censoring the words, and You have been warned.'''

You know how we have that rule against inappropriate avatars? Y'know, you can't use p**n as your icon?

I've noticed a staggering amount of people abusing a loophole, as nothing is said where you can't use p**n as your icon, provided it's cropped so you can't see anything inappropriate.

Now, this might be okay if you wanted to just use a stupid rubber duck in the background, but what I see 100% of the time with these icons is they go for the more... expressive parts of the face. Ones that are certainly more... pleasured, I'll leave it at that.

And my problem with this is that, we have kids visiting this wiki. Even if they're not part of the community, kids still visit this wiki, and might see these avatars. And we're basically allowing them to see glimpses of p**n, just because we cropped out the inappropriate parts, and yet we still have some very dubious content, content that is very inappropriate if given context, that is not cropped out?

I don't see why this is allowed.

Now, I am aware several users have done this in the past, including a staff member, and I'd like to remedy how this may work for them. I'll allow you to also assign a vote number to your vote.

These are listed in order of how severe the punishment is, not in how favorable these votes are.

Note this is not how the ordinary punishments will be held out to users who didn't do it until this rule was in place if the vote succeeds. This is only for what punishment the users who did this before the rule is in place will receive. 