Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-5939269-20160919170459/@comment-25546049-20160919225016

Lily8763cp wrote: Light Bomber wrote: Lily8763cp wrote: Protanly wrote: Lily8763cp wrote: Protanly wrote: GamesterD wrote: If our current system was fine now, we wouldn't be having so many issues such as a huge number of low ranking staff and a complete lack of high ranking staff. That reason is very simple.

High Ranking Staff are getting bored of the wiki and are leaving, while Low Ranking Staff are too scared to go any higher, don't have the things needed, or they don't want to.

Nothing is wrong with the system, what is wrong is the condititon of PvZ and the staff. If the current system no longer works as intended, it's a broken system, even if it's from the result of us. The purpose is for editting, and the editting system is fine.

I might be "blind" to what's wrong with the system, but I don't see any problems. Chat moderators, the lowest along with rollback staff position, costs 100 ms edits.

Forum moderators, the 2nd lowest along Content Moderator, costs 250, even though it's focused on the forum. FORUM.

Admins are basically a "spam edits without spamming edits!" position, and buro is on the same side.

What counts for someone on mainspace, is not if they have a wealthy 99999k edits, it's that they do good edits, they contribute, they upload sound or do huge edits, not "let me put this template 500 times because we have no strategy for it" I mentioned that I agreed with the Forum Mod idea, but I'm unsure about his idea on Rollback, and don't understand the other ideas he has (though removing mainspace edits could be a good idea, but could also not be good, depending on the situtation.) And remember; if you don't like his direction, you can make your own direction. This isn't just a voting thread, it's also discussion about what we can do with our wiki's future.