Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-25368137-20161107190920/@comment-25648422-20161108142957

Camwood777 wrote: If you put limits on democracy, that's not democracy. Everything has its limits boundaries. Not every change that is being proposed is always good. For all proposals and votes that clearly weren't really helpful from the very beginning, they get closed and ultimately vetoed.

Let's say a user created a thread to propose a demotion of a certain local staff member. Suppose the only reason for having that local staff member demoted is "The local staff member has been bad to many users" without providing backup solid evidences of the local staff member being "bad" to users. Is this demotion thread worthy of hosting a vote? I don't think so. Firstly, the thread is poorly made and secondly, the user did not place any solid proof of the local staff member being "bad". Such thread isn't worthy of highlight and should thusly be closed instead.