Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-26169720-20161222152844/@comment-5079138-20161222163711

Zambiealex wrote: Drek&#039;TharSuperSword wrote: Zambiealex wrote: Drek&#039;TharSuperSword wrote: Zambiealex wrote: Drek&#039;TharSuperSword wrote: Zambiealex wrote: Drek&#039;TharSuperSword wrote: Zambiealex wrote: Drek&#039;TharSuperSword wrote: Zambiealex wrote: Drek&#039;TharSuperSword wrote: 1. Those are Discord related reasons.

2. How will I abuse the "Protect" Feautre...? No I mean, I ever saw you do that on the PvZW chat (NOT DISCORD), too bad I just didn't captured the screenshot of it, otherwise it could be used as a decent proof.

And by abusing the protect feature I mean, due to the previous reason, I'm just worried you might do it as well. You probably could've just protected a page just because the recent edits weren't good and reverted. '''It's not to be abused, as it effectively prevents new users from editing them until specified requirements. '''I just lose trust on you because of that "kicking when stretching text" incident on the actual PvZW chat, as it's considered abusive due to not given the "mild warning" first (i.e. telling that it's not good). Sure, you might've changed now, but it's just too soon, and such things might lead to a worse power abuse. IIRC you did it on early December, so it's just considered too soon. You need to wait a few months until I'm totally sure you don't do that kinda stuff again, then I'm probably gonna support, provided you don't make any kind of troubles again. It is in the rules. But I guess it doesn't TELL people to KICK immediately when someone violates it. There MUST be a warning first, which in this case, you didn't give any. You just said something like "did you just stretched those text?" and "OK, I'm just gonna kick you", then kick him, even though he only did it ONCE. That's not the right thing to do. What kind of mod would I be if I did not give them a warning. You don't understand. What I mean is you just KICKED him without giving a simple warning about it being disallowed (e.g. "hey, that's actually not allowed. if you do that again it will be a kick, ok?"), but INSTEAD, you just said "did you just stretched some text?" and kicked him.

Gosh, you just seem to go back and forth about this. I told "him" many times to stop. Proof? If you can't give any proof then I'm gonna assume you're lying. I saw you doing this on the chat and you NEVER, EVER give any mild warnings to him (that kick counts as a stricter warning). Wait who is this him? Uhhh (facepalm). Whatever, because you're asking for that question (which I don't remember who did that, but I saw the person stretching the F-word for a bit), but you told me you "gave him many warnings", you just exposed your own weakness.

I'll stick to oppose then. No further discussion necessary. Then that is invalid. You don't know who the person is. Hey, but at least you said you told "him" many times so stop, which contradicts with your "who is this 'he'" thingy. So yeah, you kinda lied for a bit there. So much for being "invalid reason".