User blog:Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls/Why I removed a certain rule

This edit may cause some to worry but unlike last time, I will not allow it to go back because this is for the good of the wiki. Let's face it. Nepotism is rampant. People are just voting people in based on number of edits and friendship votes. The evaluation outcomes will remain the same and I would say you can vote but veto power may be required. This has caused drama and people becoming too scared of demotion and people wanting to demote bloody everyone.

My question is why...WHY are we promoted as admins when we only manage the wiki the way YOU tell us to? Are we just your puppets? Surely, we have more experience to become admins in the first place. Also, why are there threads for things that should blatantly obviously happen? Te Just Do It vote has no meaning.

While I won't go all out North Korea or anything and you can still vote and criticise me, I'm not going to become a puppet either. Your guilty conscience may force you to say "no, we want democracy" but deep down, you need a stricter system to prevent the wiki from anarchy.

By the way, if anyone does try to add the rule back, I will close whatever thread says so regardless of what it says. The rule is vague anyway so if you do want it back, at least define Wikia dictatorship.