Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-27053902-20161130163318/@comment-24024415-20161203231537

TheGollddMAN wrote:

It's a given that if you want money out of customers, you have to make something that makes them want to get it and as expected, it has to better than something obtained for free...

...Most premiums before post-LC era were absurdly crap because they were nerfed and not many bought them: Chomper, Pea-nut, Torchwood, Sap-fling, Squash, Jalapeno... Really? It MUST be better in every single case? I can refute that point right now: Power is one of numerous reasons to pay for plants. I could pay for an OP plant for an easier game, a gimmicky plant for new gameplay niches and artificial challenge or even some of the weaker returning plants out of blinding nostalgia alone. You assume that power is the only indicator for a successful plant. The mindset works for you, but please, stop insulting other's opinions because they conflict with your own.

P.S.: How are you gaining sales figures for individual sales of premium plants to validate your claims that many have not purchased them? Or is that another one of your assumptions based on your own opinions?