Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-7503158-20150128112004/@comment-26212615-20150130095159

Echoson wrote: Ytxmobile wrote: Inactive users, like me, may come back and give new contributions. It is unfair to demote inactive users because being inactive is not something that should be considered to be "wrong". It is not "wrong" it is just, what is the point of being promoted if you are not going to do anything to benefit the wiki? Imagine if this is a restaurant, the employees are now retired and you can't hire any new ones, the restaurant begins losing money due to no one working and their résumés are full.

Would you rather have new members taking over their roles and making the wiki better, or have inactive members do nothing but is promoted for no purpose? Users may become inactive because of their internet, and then when they come back for 2-3 months, they might see that their privileges are gone. They will need to earn all their edits back and it'll be hard. Like me.