Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20161209151123/@comment-24024415-20161209152555

Camwood777 wrote:

ThisUserLikesOreo wrote: We had a vote on this. The pages aren't in the past tense because the archived template is there. That's not really enough; it's just a template. The content on the page itself is still talking as though it's still accessible. But it's not! It has ceased to be! It has gone to meet it's maker! It's pushing up daisy! It is EX-CONTENT! Nostalgia Critic aside, the template does state that the content being represented is not available, similar to the seasonal Premiums of PvZ2. Though those can still be purchased and used given the time, the archived content is clearly labeled as inaccessible by the template. It is ex-content, but it states it is being used as an archive article, thus not needing to be edited to be in a tense that would be doubly affirmative that it is inaccessible.