Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-3398859-20170629222924/@comment-26239911-20170703210807

Camwood777 wrote: ThisUserLikesOreo wrote: Camwood777 wrote: Since you asked for a chronology, here it is.
 * 1) TheO casts their original vote
 * 2) It is disqualified
 * 3) TheO changes their vote
 * 4) AWB tallies the votes, and does not count is, claiming it is disqualified. However, he does not use the template, and his reason given is not a valid reason.

Neither was it stated that the default for split votes such as that is 0.5. Not to mention, most votes (with the exception of neutrals and support-neutral/neutral-oppose) count as 1 vote. Since 1 is the standard metric, and 1 has been used for split votes such as SSU's in the past...

In the old thread BF10 linked, I did a similar thing by attempting to disqualify votes I thought were going off wrong ideals. It didn't work, and resulted in a rule being added stating you cannot do that. I recognize this was wrong, but I still did it, and I apologize, but that's irrelevant. I assume you'd already know you can't disqualify votes you feel are "wrong" or disqualify votes to make a result you want, however, because you posted in that thread. What? But it went like this:
 * 1) TheO voted;
 * 2) TheO changed his vote;
 * 3) TheO's vote was disqualified.

Well, I think that we should clarify that up in another thread then. No, it wasn't. The dates don't line up for that to be the case. He edited his vote AFTER disqualification. No, no he didn't. He voted, then changed his vote in another reply, and then it was disqualified. He never edited his vote.