Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-26470588-20170320175411

Alright, I guess I'll run for rollback. It's a starter position, so I'll go for it. The basics: I have around 120. I've been here almost a year. I haven't been banned ever. That's for you to decide and say no.
 * You need 100 edits.
 * You need to have been on the wiki for at least one month.
 * You need to not have been banned for more than two weeks of the past six months.
 * You must have at least 50% Supports.

Pros

 * I am sensitive to mistakes that others make- if there's a wrong template or grammar mistake on a page, I'll be editing it shortly.
 * I'm extremely supportive of the wiki and want it to succeed, so I will never vandalize.
 * I look out just for new pages to edit by clicking Random Page, just to benefit the wiki's growth.
 * There are only 3 rollbacks, anyway. We need more and I think I would be a good candidate.

Cons

 * My edits are small and sometimes just a single letter. However, rollback is about correcting bad edits, not as much about making good ones.
 * I tend to derail on threads sometimes. However, I've been working on this and it doesn't matter anyway because I'm running for rollback, not discussion mod.

Final Statement
I'm not going to get supported. Go on and vote. I want to see your opinions. Thanks, and sayonara!

 