Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-25546049-20151127195434/@comment-24275721-20151129183926

IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: Continuing from the last thread:

Sure, all the dinos try to make zombies end up in your defences, but that's what all zombies, except prospectors, are trying to do! They are trying to break your defences to get to your brains! I was talking about in respect to the dinos' abilities. What the zombies are trying to do themselves in out of the question. Here all dinos help the zombies in the same way (drop them right into our defenses via seperate methods), that's why all of them seem similar and that's where the comparison stems from. Now all we need is a dino in the Chinese version that just teleports zombies like the Zombot and we'll come full circle.

When the zombies break your defenses, that's fine because the game is "Plants vs Zombies", not Plants vs Dinos helping zombies". Alright, name something else the dinos could do without breaking the rule about dinos not directly affecting plants! You don't read do you? I'm saying the dino abilities could have been varied for both the zombies and the plants. Like Anky creating small tornadoes causing trouble for both plants AND zombies. Raptors eating plants and zombies alike, T-Rexes smashing plants and zombies alike in an area. Yes, I know most of these abilities are what some other zombies and some plants do BUT here's the thing (and this time read the damn thing):

Have you ever thought about why do the dinos affect and the zombies and not the plants? It's because PopCap has made that rule. Why are the dinos helping the zombies? Since they are just there, make them so that they care nothing about the zombies OR the plants. They are just there to create havoc for both parties and don't care about anything else. When they appear on the lawn, both the zombies AND the player's plants are in trouble. When they destroy zombies, they somewhat help plants but when they destroy the plants, they create problems as well. This means, the player cannot effectively rely on the dinos destroying the zombies. This means there would have been no need to make a Perfume Shroom aka another pointless world exclusive and could have instead made more free plants for the world. This means we coulsd have had the full dinos instead of just their front part. The dinos creating havoc for both parties alike, that concept in itself is original; not that zombies in the middle of defenses shit. As I have said, no matter which angle you're coming from, this gimmick could have been much more instead of just "Hey dinos are helping zombies for no reason! Take this particular plant and charm them so now they help you!" That Anky is super original statement is still just the worst joke you came up with. If anky did that, it would be common sense to plant nothing! Since the zombies just get sucked up into the tail without plants doing anything! Also, remember dinos are living creatures, meaning they won't interfere with the plants! Seriously, READ THE WHOLE F*CKING THING!! Ankys suck up BOTH plants and zombies meaning you have to save your plants from the incoming doom which is much more intense than some zombies coming towards you! The plants are just in danger as the zombies. And you can even purposefully sacrifice them as the Anky is also slowly moving towards you. If they had made it, trust me, it would have been more composite than what we have (then we'd have complete dino parts instead of just front ones). The dinos don't interfere with plants as it is coded as such. I'm saying what would have been lost to code it differently? Like Being aggressive towards both plants and zombies. You have DINOSAURS POPCAP, USE THEM FOR F*CKS SAKE!! Now do you understand IG?