Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170207035621/@comment-1764483-20170207210141

Hey look, my stance hasn't changed in... 2 years? Lol.

Also, YUNO RESPOND TO MY POINTS? >:-((((( (joking)

Now to address this:


 * Protanly: "'We'll just use whatever is used more', meaning 'Hey let's allow people to change it every week just because Popcap sent a push notification to my phone that used He instead of she, breaking the tie and therefore making it male instead of female. Time to farm edits that contribute nothing by changing freaking pronouns so everyone will think I'm super helpful and contribute a ton to this wiki by getting a high mainspace edit number."
 * Camwood777: "Do you really think that's how majorities work? You do know that people would need proof that PopCap did that (which, by the way, they obviously wouldn't do) before that would be done. Also, slippery slope fallacy; how on Earth is just allowing for plant genders going to lead to edit farming?"

Um, we do kind of have proof for push notifications. See this for Fire Peashooter. As for the slippery slope allegation, he did say that changing the stance on plant genders would lead to people making minuscule edits. Since it does serve a valid purpose, here's your gold star.

Also, Starfruity, thanks for addressing Sun-shroom.