Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170207035621/@comment-5407503-20170207072457

Camwood777 wrote: However, be warned: until further notice by an administrator, if your reason falls under any of the reasons I address in the counter-counterclaims section, I will disqualify it under the assumption that it is a blind vote, unless you do indeed have a valid reason for stating the claim and the counter-counterclaim may be invalidated.

Again, keep in mind that if your reason is the same as a reason that I directly address and debunk, I will disqualify it until further consensus to the contrary by higher-up staff, under the assumption that it is a blind vote That means we can disqualify others by just... making more counter arguments? If there is one opposer in this thread, that means...

All the voting threads will be messed up if all users can disqualify others by simply pointing out the mistakes of others (I do it too). Everyone has their own opinions and values to choose their favorite option. The point sounds illogical to you? But this is a community, every user wants to express their preferred option and fight for it. As long as the reasons do not fall into the disqualified ones in the page, they are valid.

In order to prevent any more misconception or conflict from arising in this thread and the future, this kind of disqualification is not allowed. You argument is good, but my point stands too.