User blog comment:Protanly/Protanly's views on the current state of the wiki/@comment-24024415-20161212150512

Thought what you said was right about your suggested demotion, the "edit = activity" argument does have SOME validity, as by putting oneself in a state of power it is important to use it appropriately. That could mean not to abuse said power, but it also suggests that the user uses the power. Otherwise we would have a lot of power holders that do not use their power, we get bloated staff lists and nothing gets done.

Of course, you've also stated that you only edit large articles of high importance, which coincides with the update schedule of PvZ content and the vote did not use that point before users began to vote. It's a fair point, what if we just don't have a use for Content Moderators for an extended period of time? Do you blame the user, the content creator or the system that implemented it? I guess people just jumped to conclusions too quickly.