Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-26169720-20160814153130/@comment-5143323-20160817060827

Zambiealex wrote: Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls wrote: Foxtail Firepaw Flames wrote: Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Zambiealex wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Zambiealex wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote: Here is the thing:

Let people oppose if they have really valid reasons to oppose. Sometimes, you can't easily convince a person to change their mind. Enough said. Why are you all derailing this thread? Read all of the above replies and you will see that we are not derailing this thread.

As for your question about my reasons for opposing you for running for the position of rollback, my answer is: it's not a silly accusation. One example is in the thread in where people proposed for IYNH to be demoted. Some of your replies were not suitable that they had to be removed from the thread. Forum has no connection to Mainspace. You don't earn badges on Forum. This is mainspace. I get the whole not enough mainspace. I can't argue with that. Forum may not be connected to mainspace but your attitude will be still checked. If a user is active in mainspace but has a habit of harassing users or spamming in the forum and wants to be a rollback, do you think that user should be promoted? I don't think so.

And actually, you can still earn badges from making forum edits but the badges that you can only obtain are the Lucky Blovers. Guys just leave him.

If he's not handicapped, a troll, and this is his goddamn 4th try. You can tell how hard he is trying so just please let the guy have the button.

It;s just a pretty useless right.

I do like Zambie but I'm only opposing because of what I think. Granted, persistence is pretty well but I say a longer wait is needed as it looks power-hungry. I'm not saying he IS power-hungry but he does look like he is. You do realize that no one said I was power-hungry as a reason of there opposes.

I know that but I am saying it LOOKS power-hungry.