Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-26488146-20170322230110/@comment-26488146-20170326152435

DatDramaPlant wrote: Zombiecrab wrote: DatDramaPlant wrote: Zombiecrab wrote: That is for an article. Your vote should be considered invalid, because it does not support your oppose, because the reason that you used to support your "oppose" does not actually justify opposing, since says that we already have a template for it, but WE DON'T, the template is for a page, not part of a page. It does not relate to a section, but an entire page. GAAH! I don't know how to say it, but your vote should be considered invalid. Wait to see how you respond and how other users respond to disqualify/not disqualify your vote.

We do have TCLP's section variant, so we still technically have a template... Not the template he mentioned, though, which is the page one. He should vote again, this time maybe mentioning TCLP's template. sorry, I am a stickler for rules and doing things properly. IT DOESN'T MATTER!

Excuse me.

Anyway voting period is up, so I guess it's opposed? But do we use the section template that TCLP made or what? Sigh... I suppose. Looks like... we should do that. Sigh. Can't beleive this got opposed.