Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-27138615-20160529185435/@comment-28855246-20160530134320

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Camwood777 wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Zambiealex wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Zambiealex wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote: Before I place my vote though, allow me to say that Hige's avatar did not seem kinky. It seems to merely depict someone just gasping happily. I don't see how it's sexual. It does not even look like a Terms of Violation. Besides, I think the perfect to complain is when someone uses an avatar that shows a completely nude woman. Emphasis on "completely nude".

That's sort of avatar is what you can say a Terms of Use violation. Slow down Pink! That was a kinky photo he cropped and posted. What's kinky about gasping? :V When I was going on Google finding PVZ pictures I came across a very inappropriate pvz pic. I left it and I forgot about it. Then Hige came across it and cropped it. The thing it's not a Terms of Use violation though. It showed only a face that could mean different meanings but it's no ToU violation. How exactly is... Can I say it? Promise you won't give me a warning for saying what it is? Is what? Make sure to censor any swear word you might use. Ill spill the beans, Hige used cropped Pornography.