Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-5079138-20170807134618/@comment-26470588-20170807184731

Happy-shroom wrote: Teacup Terry wrote:

Drek&#039;TharSuperSword wrote:

Teacup Terry wrote: -snip- 2. "Bias" and "drama" are a non-factor in this. I've been in a lot of drama, but I'm not getting phenomenally low scores on the SEFs. Even Camwood, the person who I had insane amounts of drama with still gave me a decent score.

"...if this is voted to be removed...it should be removed after the upcoming deliberation period, so that way staff that were rated bad...are demoted." If you're going to use Camwood as a reason, it is very faulty. He gave you your score BEFORE the incident happened (unless there is another incident that I do not know of). After the Jack incident with the dictatorship rule, he gave Jack a VERY low score, yet Jack is still a good b-crat.

Secondly, Drek made this now because he wishes to remove the drama that will come if it isn't removed, so if ZombieCrab wants to remove this after, I don't think it will be a very good idea. I've seen much more drama on the wiki than you have, and the consequences are massive. Many staff members have left the wiki due to these reasons.

Drek, to even strengthen your point on non-staff member voting, Camwood and PeaVZ were both previous staff members when they were voting.

Finally, my vote

Terry, if you assume that Drek is doing this because he has a low rating, then can't I also assume that you're opposing because you have a near perfect rating? Not really. I don't think I deserve my rating. And I'm giving strong and supported reasons for most of my reasons. Maybe I seem rude or conceited, and I'm sorry for that. But the staff evaluation forms are important. And I guess maybe the camwood thing may be flawed, but the only reason that camwood gave jack a low score after the drama is because he had personal beef with jack- not just because he was in the drama. And only one person can barely affect it at all.