Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-25133884-20151118172339/@comment-26988423-20151121102957

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

Crazyzombie168 wrote: Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Gaming Center wrote:

Chat is usually "dead" when there's no spoilers and most of people (including me) like spoilers. So you're saying that talking about spoilers will make chat alive? That's like as if we should have roleplaying in main chat when the rule says we can't even though roleplaying makes chat alive with all the users participating in it. Making chat alive is not even a requirement. It depends on what topic or discussion keeps a user interested to continue talking about. Remember that from time to time chat contains a small number of users or sometimes no users at all. Come on guys. What if someone got banned from chat for revealing spoilers before? Doesn't anyone think that removing this rule may be unfair for anyone who revealed spoilers before and got kicked and or banned? This reminded me of one time when I read a bureaucrat's old blog here saying users will be unblocked after March 26 (not 2015 or 2016) or something like that when some upcoming PvZA information will be released on March 26. Also if one would like to share spoilers with someone, there's PMs. I have no idea why is everybody forgetting the PMs. They still deserve to be banned, because they a broke a rule when it was there. Simple as. Seriously? SERIOUSLY? When you add/remove rules, it's actually always best to imagine it as always there/never there. This situation calls for no change at all. Reminds me of those times when a number of users got banned from chat before for swearing.