Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-5407503-20141115040026

Two years ago.

A user, called Someone456, he edited every day and got 1000 edits under 2 months. He was very exciting and wanted to be a rollback.

Another user, he hated Someone456's nationality. He couldn't let me promoted. So he called the top editor (then) to say we had enough staff, no matter how good you were!

Someone456 was disappointed. He couldn't get what he wanted and desired even he helped, protected and loved the wiki.

One month had passed, the first b-crat came back and promoted Someone456 to rollback. Of course, he was demoted by that hater again with that reason.

Almost all users were incensed, they helped Someone456, and he finally got promoted. He is the top user on the wiki now.

Now, I see many users meet the requirements to be a rollback, but they were demoted because the reboot. And they cannot be promoted because the positions are filled up. '''Does it really matter how many staff members there are? Staff should be awarded based on contributions and attitude.''' You can oppose them, but you can't prevent them to have a chance to request.

Support for remove.

Oppose for not remove.

Remember you need to have 25 mainspace edits and have been on the wiki for at least two weeks to vote.

I understand those users' feelings. 