Board Thread:Weekly discussions/@comment-27769607-20171019073549/@comment-33345763-20171022072154

JeloElducal wrote: The Skarmy Goat wrote: ClassicVideoGameFan wrote: So:

Popcap's PvZ bought by EA: decent games, way too many freemium and paying for things.

If Popcap's PvZ was bought by Nintendo: decent - great games, mobile would never see the light of day, sony = no pvz for u, and it most likely would be nintendo consoles only.

If Popcap's PvZ was bought by Valve: 500 years still no PvZ 3.

If Popcap was still PvZ owner: decent - great games, but would eventually be the pen that rolls under the TV table.

.

.

.

.

Did I get it right? But hey, EA did a good thing to PvZ. They made it to mobile devices. If nobody buys Popcap, all their games never go to mobile and they get bankrupt during 2012/2013. then again, the pros never outweigh the cons in this case...i think Still better than PvZ dying during 2012.