Board Thread:Reporting Station/@comment-24739709-20141124234154/@comment-1764483-20141125233912

Ducksoup wrote: It looks to me like it was for putting up the demotion threads, and that's not OK, so that needs to be rectified.

Cheetah, anyone can ask staff to review community actions. We'll always arrive and do what I'm doing now: assess the situation and try to find a way for the community to work together. Ducksoup, incorrect. We had to deal with this BEFORE the demotion threads.

ZombieNinja723's rationales on why NapalmRosalina should have been demoted from administrator, based on what he said on my talk page (a while ago, mind you):


 * 1) She got administrator right after rollback, which is kind of hasty. (Admittedly, this is invalid.)
 * She, JemCel03 (who regretes this), and Wintermelon43 (who left the wiki) accused him (ZN723) of "cheating" on his promotion thread because he ignored a user's vote who didn't have enough mainspace edits. (The rules say that in order to vote on management and policy discussions, the user must have 25 mainspace edits, and since then, another rule was added, adding two weeks to that rule as well.) Strike one. Also, saying, "Can some admins vote please? then we can all shut up," is totally rude. Strike two. Last, when WM43 admitted he was "cheating", NASA (previously NR) said, "Good job Wintermelon!" which was also rude. Strike three. She's out.
 * 1) NASA told Milesprower2 she hates him because he demoted Wintermelon43. (WM43 abused his chat moderator rights, and he was an administrator.) You can actually go onto his talk page and see it.
 * 2) She gave ambiguous reasons to support her interpretation of some plants' Plant Food abilities. (That really is a petty argument, perhaps invalid.)
 * 3) She created a thread under the wiki management branch, maligning ZN723. It is called "I only want admins and higher-class staffs to read this." ZN723 didn't care about what the title said; he thought it was pretty rude to do that.