Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies Wiki discussion/@comment-1716189-20150928012119/@comment-1716189-20150928082559

Someone456 wrote: kind words Not at all, this is a discussion thread and I'm very content to see the opposing points as well!

Look, with all due respect to your and your fellow staff's "undoubtedly better experiences and skills" I know for a fact that you can't estimate the public interest better than the public opinion. Claiming to always know what's the best to do and seperate decide which ones are ridiculus is exactly the definition of dictatorship; if you think it's ridiculus & unneeded, that's your stance, if that's really the case, then the public opinion will also vote that way. Especially vetoing a "Passed resolution" is completely inaccaptable and against the will of the wikians. Aside from that, something being "detrimental" or not is your personal stance and as you reason it in the discussion, rational side of the public shall agree with you naturally. The whole idea of this discussion is deciding that is out of your job definition of maintaining the wiki.

Looking at the pass vetoed resolutions, most of them are vetoed due to a rule or common logical sense, which is fine as I stated. If you have spesific examples, please provide below. In most cases the staff member uses a rule or policy to back-up his disqualifying, which is fine and needed as I stated. However, imo all thread closions should be made on a legal base.

PS: I even put a Too Much ; didn't read section for those who brief explanations. I tried to include as much examples and spesifications as possible in the main text to further clarify the main idea. It's a discussion thread isn't it ^_^