Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies Wiki discussions/@comment-27138615-20170704063709/@comment-6031945-20170706100008

B-doom13 wrote: VeXJL wrote:

Also, if I'm being totally honest, most of the rollbacks don't need the position anyways because they don't vary their editing places. The edits are basically 100% PvZH, and nothing else. They don't add or remove wiki management templates, as well as edit in articles with those certain templates.

This is B-doom13:

It feels like that in the whole wiki though, most edits I see are PvZH, because they get 'bigger' updates than PvZ2 and PvZGW2. My question is, is that bad for the wiki? Other pages need clean-up, and they're being ignored. Sorry to go off track, but it seems like we need to change this. I was planning to do something like that, but I had some school priorities to do....

Nick Archer wrote: I like the fact how users started to freak out about the shortage of content mods after I got promoted to admin. Well, I shouldn't inform everyone about this. Hope you guys don't targeted me for being the contributor that causes the shortage of content mods to happen, as well as trying to knock me out from the team. Time to demote you to Content mod then

Zambiealex wrote: We seriously do not need to candidate more users, let nature take its course. We could do that. But, at least this thread can inspire some users who are up for the job to become one, being part of the "nature" of its course and all.