Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-24843074-20161030184616/@comment-24275721-20161030204558

Legofan9o5 wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: Legofan9o5 wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: -Mindless Stars-

-Casuals Idealizing OP Prems-

-OP Prems in strategies-

You can very well have a sword in an RPG that has purification against all poison types but if you only rely on that without seeing how other weapons turn out to be, then it's your fault, not the sword's for being there. You make your game only as bland as you yourself can be. But playing mindless did allow me to gain every star.

I was once a "casual" in PvZ2, and I was allowed to breeze through. Now I have gone through this "even more casual" PvZ2 and became more adept to fending off zombies in much more difficult scenarios. I learned nothing from Pre 1.7, I can tell you that. Other than "this plant hardcounters that" and "this plant is good for general play", I never felt like the roster of Pre. 1.7 or its levels promoted me to think more critically. ...that options have to be varied ... that's his/her fault and since this is a freemium game, the devs will include such options to get money. So at the end, the player IS the culprit for giving in to the temptations. -Gimmick levels of 1.7-

...if you really did get all stars by just mindlessly playing then either you are bluffing or you are even better than me because I had a tough as nails moment my first time. Well obviously since our opinions do not match, I think these plants should be here and more should come even since, well, I like them.

At its core, if a level does not have any restrictions whatsoever, then goals and/or objectives should even exist in the first place if I have to go by your logic. Even in the present version there are those and we still use plants catered towards the goals. Both versions are the same (old and new) but I still believe the old one did a better job at teaching the players strategy.

Even though OPs overshadow others, once again, the players should decide that. I have CSD, I may very well use WW in its place sometimes. That's how anyone should do it and I think badmouthing the results is just spitballing the entire thing when the causes are not corrected whatsoever. But if anyone doesn't follow variety or use different strats and keep using the same thing, then it's their decision to do so and then we may be arguing for no discernible reason all this time.

Bottomline, both of us have different ideals and it's obvious that so far we have agreed on nothing. But you keep yours and I'll keep mine. Let's enjoy the game in our different ways.