Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27138615-20160427134437

Before you close this, Well, remember this thread? Thread:537230 Well, it's about time we do something more of it. I know well that he hasn't been inactive for three months, but I have my reasons on why he should be demoted below.

A bureaucrat is one of the most powerful users in this wiki. Not only do they have the other rights part of the staff hierarchy, but they can also promote users to bureaucrats, admins, and users that follow the mainspace user rights route, and demote the latter two that I mentioned. I know, they're impressive.

However, since this isn't a lesson, let me just tell you something even more important. We're having less and less bureaucrat activity while we get more and more people running for moderators and/or rollbacks. But there's one user who I don't feel isn't performing well as I should expect from a bureaucrat, and that is Maxus Overlord.

"But Marcia, you don't need to be active 12/7 to show you're active!" Well, look what we have here, his contributions list. His more recent contributions are having large gaps in-between them. Plus, '''he's a bureaucrat. '''Can you at least show some consistency? You're one of the most powerful users in the wiki, and you need to do your job more. Otherwise, I have to find that you are not worthy of your position. This is even worse since I think we're having even less bureaucrat activity. Practically most of our bureaucrats we have are some wiki seniors.

I understand that you're busy and that you've lost your phone, but you need to show some more activity, Maxus. If you don't be consistent with your activity, then you're not worthy of bureaucrat. Also, here's my quote from the vote started this all.

"Staff members are meant to be role models to the regular users, too. If we are going to have staff who are not performing well, then sad to say that they aren't good role models. Staff members are also meant to be active members of the community and should be able to do what they ran for well."

He hasn't been really been doing anything major lately either, and bureaucrats are you know, someone who would do something major to help out the wiki. I'm sorry about having to do this, but let's be honest, we can't have bureaucrats with inconsistent activity if we're having less bureaucrat activity lately.

So with that said, may the voting begin. 