Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20170617134530/@comment-27769607-20170618033510

YammaYamer21 wrote: Happy-shroom wrote: YammaYamer21 wrote:

Bearjedi wrote:

YammaYamer21 wrote:

Bearjedi wrote:

Technically, the bureaucrats already have total power over the wiki. Heck, one of them could go rogue right now and destroy the wiki as a one-user-wrecking-crew. It's a stupid rule that doesn't need to be enforced. Do you see this rule on other wikis? No. And the bureaucrats don't run everything on those wikis either. OK, so do the bureaucrats run everything or do they not? Also, no, if a bureaucrat or all the bureaucrats went rogue, the actual wikia staff would shut them down if it was an obvious attempt at destroying a wikia. Exactly, so that's why this rule is pointless! The bureaucrats already know what to do, they don't need a simple sentence to remind themselves. ... what? The user who caused this whole dilemma a reality is basically saying they might need to do exactly what you're saying they don't need a reminder to not do. Bearjedi did NOT start this dilemma, Jackninja5 did. ... where did you get the idea I was accusing Bearjedi of it? I was saying that Bearjedi claimed that we didn't need the rule because it was redundant, but I was reminding him that the reason we're even voting on this was because Jackninja5 was saying that no, this whole "wikia dictatorship" thing might be something he'd want in the future.

Sorry, I got confused on which dilemma you were talking about.