Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-26945790-20160309105736/@comment-26988423-20160324133401

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

The Ancient Pult Ancestor wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

The Ancient Pult Ancestor wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote: The Ancient Pult Ancestor wrote: Phanminhnhat wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

The Ancient Pult Ancestor wrote: Can someone just please make a rule like the "No Bomb Joke" law already?

Either way, all joke accounts have no right to remain alive. It doesn't exactly change anything, he'll get a warning whether the rule existed. Calm down and think logically. Yeah, you're right. As I said, what part of having a law to enforce & strengthen things lacks logic? Oh *facepalm*, I type things sometimes. You get the gist, don't you? :/

Welp, any other stuff? Yeah...the kid who believes in Bowser harrassed the guy who bombed him, & still ain't punished That user getting a ban from chat for harassment is enough for a punishment. As long as he does not do anything screwed-up in this wiki, he won't get blocked. You guys might think he should get blocked for what he wrote in his userpage but what he wrote there has been undone and that's enough as of now. He may be underaged...read his reply to IYNH (talk page): "I WAS WARNING YOU ABOUT BOWSER! HE'S A BAD BOY!"

And yah, in the same comment, he didn't want a ban, but he wanted to be blocked so Bowser can be blocked.

Anyway, it seems like he's dead...for now... Would you care to explain why you think he's underaged? Standard stuff, duh. Grammar, phrasing, etc. Bad grammar, phrasing =/= Underaged user.

My grammar and phrasing of some words sometimes go awry. Now tell me: does that make me underaged? Well I know that, but I assumed that that's what TAPA meant because that's the most common reason.