Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-33574414-20170818154428/@comment-26470588-20170826195814

Zombiecrab wrote: Newspaper Zombie wrote: Zombiecrab wrote: Teacup Terry wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote: also when can my warning be removed, it's not worth a warning, i just made a slightly bad edit onto a page.

i still added strategies, i just didn't use correct terminology on pages.

and i never started the edit war, the edit got reverted for no reason, i reverted it back and added a little reason in the edit summary

and once again, it was removed without anything in the edit summary to say why.

so, as an editor, i'm very confused why i'm the one being punished, while the other person removed the edit mutliple times without informing me why, and gets off scotch free.

and the threat (which was just saying i should report you for this) was to the user who kept undoing my edit, because he never specified directly why it should be removed, other than the strategy being unpopular, and if we read mainspace policy, removing a strategy from a page that doesn't fit your standards is not allowed.

so, nick archer did break the rules, and so did his accomplices, and i'm the one being punished.

and whenever i question this, the mods sweep it under the rug, repeat the same point that i'm debunking for the 3rd for 4th time in this request, and just brush it off. omg mental y r u continuing the argument!1! u are such bad and stupid xd

in all seriousness, why do you still have the warning? His warning is for, "causing edit wars and threatening users", both of which he did. Mental Skillness wrote:

Teacup Terry wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote: also when can my warning be removed, it's not worth a warning, i just made a slightly bad edit onto a page.

i still added strategies, i just didn't use correct terminology on pages.

and i never started the edit war, the edit got reverted for no reason, i reverted it back and added a little reason in the edit summary

and once again, it was removed without anything in the edit summary to say why.

so, as an editor, i'm very confused why i'm the one being punished, while the other person removed the edit mutliple times without informing me why, and gets off scotch free.

and the threat (which was just saying i should report you for this) was to the user who kept undoing my edit, because he never specified directly why it should be removed, other than the strategy being unpopular, and if we read mainspace policy, removing a strategy from a page that doesn't fit your standards is not allowed.

so, nick archer did break the rules, and so did his accomplices, and i'm the one being punished.

and whenever i question this, the mods sweep it under the rug, repeat the same point that i'm debunking for the 3rd for 4th time in this request, and just brush it off. omg mental y r u continuing the argument!1! u are such bad and stupid xd

in all seriousness, why do you still have the warning? i have no clue

all i did was make a bad edit, it's just the biased staff system hates me for being a menace to their ideas, so they're 3 times as harsh. I'm sure that we're all conspiring against you for no reason at all. Oh come on, stop feeding the trolls. I just don't understand why Terry is supporting him and making fun of us. She does seem a little like she's being a troll. Eh. My behaviour is abysmal at this point, so whatever. As for me supporting him, that's just because he's right. Either both he and Nick Archer should be warned because they both committed the same warnable offense or neither should because it's a really basic offense.