Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-27462035-20170820215643/@comment-27462035-20170904150007

Pescavelho wrote:

If has gender use it! Uh... no-one here would refer to a Sunflower in real life as "she". Yes, even though a plant is scientifically male or female, it really doesn't matter. I don't know why you would want to use botanics in here, but Popcap always gets their genders wrong and inconsistent.

Now to the main idea of basing gender off of descriptions... why would you base gender off those?!! Popcap is very inconsistent with genders there like they don't care! Plus, not to mention the fact that having SOME plants or zombies have genders, makes it messy! Descriptions, in my eyes, are nothing you should decide gender off of! They are inconsistent, and following that rule, makes our wiki inconsistent as well. Do you absolutely need to state a not so obvious gender to refer to a plant? How in the f*** is someone going to know whether Sunflower is she or he just by first glance? They wouldn't.

Also, you opposers saying it's simpler to base gender off of descriptions, do mind how much easier it is to refer to Snow Pea as it. You don't have to look at a description, which makes it all the more simple.