Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-25230228-20170406135559/@comment-26470588-20170407023800

Birdpool wrote: Just something I'd like to add: Consider taking the point of this thread, the SupportPercent and OposePercent abilities into account. Someone who doesn't completely support something is forced to use "Support - Neutral" even if they hev more than a 50% supportive stance, but less than a 100% supportive stance. Opinions are a spectrum, not a polar thing, and the existing system fails to properly represent that. '''That is the point of this htread, not just "making certain existing templates have more or less influence", which is all you're seeing. Read the whole thread in its entirety before you blindly accuse it of something irrelevant, please. It's funny that I'm saying that because that's what it says at the top of the thread! ''' -talking to something at the top of the thread, wow- Why would someone be so picky about an extra 25% of their support that they have to screw up the voting system for it? It seems -and this is strange- that you're deadset on making neutral votes count. Here's a refresher. 'Neutral votes don't count. They're not supposed to count and they never should be able to. I don't see even slightly why you're so deadset on making them count, because That's What They Do- Not Count.' Thanks. And P.S.: Everyone read the entire thing. The people the oppose just think it made no sense.