Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-24203813-20160112230454/@comment-24024415-20160113233230

Brainulator9 wrote:

Agree with all, but a few last notes for the last two points:
 * Commands aren't necessarily rude or excessive.
 * Again, that's not bias, that's just critical thinking. Newspaper Zombie works too similarly to how it worked in the first game to be split, hence why I dismissed it as stupid. If saying that is stupid, wouldn't bias influence your vote? Plenty of other users have called something stupid before me.

The command's context seemed to be out of place from the rest of the article, and gave off a feeling of "Pay attention, you idiot" rather than "You should pay attention on your topics a bit more". So yeah, interpenetration took hold. ;P



In regards to NPZ, I have thought about it and will drop every defense in order to solidify my new way of thinking for splits of pages. In terms of strategy, what I tried to exemplify as an important part for splitting, NPZ was too similar from it's previous iteration concerning strategies to warrant a split. So you are right on that front.

Also, I misinterpreted you saying NPZ being "stupid" as laziness. Your explanation makes sense now, though I will say this: cases using undefined terms should have a descriptor alongside it so the terms exerts emphasis.

EX: "NPZ's similarities outweigh it's changes, this suggestion is stupid."



Finally, concerning bias: I'm an idiot that tried to use a term that didn't belong in the context of the situation created in my head, a situation that was based on miscommunication so much that accusations would be based on absolutely nothing real. I apologize for these fraudulent accusations and I will strive to improve myself so such may happen nevermore.