Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27790153-20160619085116

At least three-quarters of user-right application threads are opposed due to several reasons. You know, Grammar, activity, power hungriness- wait, that's right! Power Hungriness.

I mean, there's really nothing to talk about. You know grammar and activity you can improve. However, how do you define Power Hungriness?

(This is for rollback rights, for an example)

-having x + 100 edits, where x < a certain amount of edits, maybe 200 more.

-having x + 1 months wiki activity, where 0 < x < 1. (This is only an estimated value.)

(Following three quotes from this thread on user right promotion to a rollback)

"You have improving space for your grammar, and the number of MS edits you have is rather close to the minimal amount required." -Microphone DJ

" Wait a bit.I think its too early for you." -Albert mc Missle

You see what I mean?

Then, Charmande red321 chimes in (in a hilarious way)

Wouldn't that mean the minimum amount is considerably useless then?

She makes a huge point in the hilarious point she makes.

If the minimum amount of edits you need is 100, then if we pass that edit, the minimal edit is considerably USELESS. You may as well decide on raising this edit point, no matter any staff, if power hungry is going to be a reason. I am curious why Elemec managed to get Chat Mod rights with 123 edits? Or SnappyDragon getting a landslide of supports with 107 edits? Because they are applying for chat mod?

My final point is: Either stop 'power hungry' as a reason or increase the edit count requirement. I have 130 mainspace for around 2 months as I am not that active yet and another reason I do not want quite to apply is because of this reason.

If staff you think you need to remove this then remove it.  