Board Thread:Weekly discussions/@comment-25546049-20160930193123/@comment-30195567-20161004005610

GamerNerd i wrote:

7SevensevnMW wrote:

GamerNerd i wrote: Okay, let's see something here:

How would you prefer PvZ2 to be financially? Free-to-Play, with IAPs. (Whether those IAPs are reasonably priced is a different story) Free-to-Play, without IAPs (ALL premiums, even gemiums, would be removed, with the possible exception of the seasonal plants like Ghost Pepper) Pay-to-Play, with no IAPs (all plants, premium or otherwise, will somehow be unlockable for free in-game) Pay-to-Play, with currency IAPs (all plants will be unlockable for free in-game, but may have to be gained with currency, like PvZ1) Would free to play without IAPs be ad supported? Because wanting free-to-play, no IAPs, and no ads would be incredibly arrogant. Hmmm.... Good point, I didn't consider that. Let's assume there would be ads of some kind. We all hate them, but honestly forced ads are kinda better than overpriced IAPs. Yeah, I agree with all that.