Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-5143323-20180113035227/@comment-26488146-20180113045442

Hmmm. I don't know about this. One one hand, a lot of the things that have been said here are indeed valid, but I feel that there's room for compromise here; I'm not sure if we should completely remove the voting system. I feel like we could make staff votes count more than regular user's votes towards supporting or opposing or choosing a choice (maybe a ratio of two to one, or higher), or we could make the requirements higher and make sure that (in some way, which I'm sure there is) that they know all of the rules, or that perhaps we could vote staff members in, but only the staff could vote them out, (somewhat like election and legislative bodies in the United States), or something... but completely removing every normal user's ability to vote, even those who are actually qualified to vote and do so fairly and constructively, doesn't feel like the right solution.