Board Thread:Requests for User Rights/@comment-7091122-20161107163850/@comment-6031945-20161110142245

Camwood777 wrote: ...And yet with this thread, there was nothing done here just because the top vote wasn't 65% or higher? It's due Jack's mistake that he made that error. From what you responded about that mistake prior to me and Someone's responses (and I'm not to harm you with that in any way), a vital thing called common sense does apply (which is something that some of us users forget....even I admited that in the past).

Wikis like this wiki doesn't do things automagically and it's understandable that not all of us understand and/or know the rules, hence such reminder is necessary. After all, I just voted on that same thread prior to Someone closing that thread less than a minute after I posted it.

At least, threads like this might help you improve yourself in this wiki and in my point of view, you have improved your resume. Though, again in my point of view, some of the cons shouldn't necessarily be there like that like that "wee 10 year old" story, which is something that isn't that counted as a "con" since it no longer have relevance in the present. Had no time as of the moment to make a posted vote about this. You could say it's just a neutral.