Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-26899500-20161011223922/@comment-25368137-20161011232225

Lily8763cp wrote: Only reason we did with plants, was for people supporting a vague, not required vote.

Look, yes, they say they have a specific gender, yay.

But tell me, don't they also mention a single thing about them? Like "He killed them mushs" does that apply for all of them? 'course not, there IS a "interviewed" Zombie or Plant in such cases, there IS a model, there isn't the whole crowd of every "kind" of zombie lining up and writting their own part on that, all they do is pick one they find to be good for the model, and write about that specific Zombie, not the whole other Zombies that have the same class.

Unless, of course, plants like Cob Cannon have the same harvad(?) study, and the list goes on and on.

The ONLY reason this thread may pass, is because people DON'T listen to the sense, and preffer to "oh no man that zombies totally a man" because APPEARANCE or SOUND. Also, because of the latter Gender Neutral vote that went supported, because of the same reason.

My oppose is to BOTH of the ideas, Plants and Zombies.