Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20160511014707/@comment-26988423-20160512124122

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Camwood777 wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote: Here is my response to Camwood:

I'm not lashing out on you or anything. I don't hate you for bringing up the idea of having an Off-Topic branch. I simply stated my reasons why I oposse for having an Off-Topic branch. Please don't jump to conclusions immediately. I stated my reasons why I opposed the idea of having an Off-Topic branch much like the others who opposed but I am not attacking you in any way. If I was attacking you, I would have tossed an insulting remark at you. And additionally, the tone I used there isn't really aggressive or does not really suggest being aggressive. In fact, if you directed that long post to me for opposing of having an Off-Topic branch, why don't you do the same to everyone else who opposed? Besides, this thread shows that I am not the only one who opposed.

Thanks for understanding. '''Not attacking is not the same as not hurting one's feelings. '''You can unintentionaly hurt someone's feelings

That, and you used an aggressive remark in this very post:

'"In fact, if you directed that long post to me for opposing of having an Off-Topic branch, why don't you do the same to everyone else who opposed?" '

So you really DIDN'T listen. Camwood, that line is in no way aggressive in any way.

Also, let's just stop the convo here. I'd hate for this thread to stray off from the real topic. It's my opinion in my vote if I disagree with having an Off-Topic branch anyway. End of story. Aww man, it was interesting!