Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-25546049-20150925225553/@comment-24203813-20150926052218

DatDramaPlant wrote: Dekagamer7X9 wrote:

DatDramaPlant wrote:

ShroomstagramUser wrote: Dekagamer7X9 wrote:

PnFforever wrote: Let's think this in a straight way, why would Popcap made something that cost 6.99. If we look back at the fact that we can hack premiums. Even before Far Future, we can still hack them. When I look back at Toadstool, Strawburst and Cactus, why would they be 4.99. And when people hack them, after that, plant starts to be 6.99. If we take account to everything.......... It's their fault for making premium plants in the first place. They could've avoided people hacking the plants in by making the game cost, say, 1.99$ or 2.99$, with no IAPs. They would've made MUCH more money that way. I'd prefer a $2.99 game over a free to play one with 100+ motherf***ing  dollars on s**t we don't need!!! You don't have to buy them. That's why I prefer Pvz2 over Pvz, the fact the it is free. (I'm talking about the GOTY version) Paying $49 to play like, that many levels? At least you don't need premium content to win (I'm talking from experience). You can still play without premiums. A game for $49.99? I'll pass. You can buy PvZ 1 GOTY Edition on Steam for $9.99. A PC version of the sequel would likely be the same price. Same with mobile, as The first game on mobile is $1.99. Free does not equal good, especially when there are 3 IAPs included that are $6.99. Here's the question: Do you have to buy them? The answer is no. Just being able to play the game without paying is good enough for me. The problem is that for free, you don't get the full game. I'd rather pay money for a full game that has all content for free than a free game that has a large amount of content, albeit optional, locked behind a paywall.