Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170207035621/@comment-1764483-20170207113527

Before I vote, I want to address two things:

First of all, is it not possible that people could read the entire thread and still use the counterarguments you addressed, not caring about their rebuttals? This has not been authorized, and if it was, I feel like this could be abused to censor dissenting opinions.

Second, in regards to your David example, that's not entirely comparable. David has been shown to have human emotions and abilities in a web cartoon driven by stories. This is a video game driven by gameplay, and any references to human behavior in plants are miniscule (Zen Garden/level up animations for one) beyond the Almanac, which contains anecdotes that have no consequence on the game itself. See also Gameplay and Story Segregation.