Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-1764483-20150829191807/@comment-1716189-20150830152609

Graham02 wrote: Brainulator9 wrote: I don't get your logic. What are you trying to say? Basically i'm saying that people treat swears like they don't do anything, but they can hurt people's feelings. Like Pinkgirl said, underaged users can come on chat, even if wikia is for 13+, doesn't mean kids will still come on. And like THP said, swear words can be easily censored.I don't really see a point for swears, but there should be a censor box imo, so that people can use swears equally. But besides, words can hurt people, you people act like swears do nothing.......but they do. (i'm guessing that you won't understand this logic either) Look, first of all, it is illegal for an underage user to come to the Lawn. If an underage user comes to the lawn, that excrement of a person is defying the law and  must face all the consequences at its own disgression. We musn't form the rules considering underage idiocraths, they are illegal in the first place, they chose to stanf OUTSIDE the law. Als, of all places, what is the chances of a kid, learning profanity on PvZ Wİkia Chatroom. Besides, I think they should learn them, they should learn that usage of those words will degrade their social status upon use.

Secondly, there is absolutely no logic behind censoring profanity. When I say pine*pple, you still get what I mean, using asterixes or other punctuation methods to censor profnity is a terrible idea, it means you are in denial. The word is still there.

Last but not least, why would a word hurt someone by itself. Usage of words hurt people, not their presence! Me talking about coconut milk shouldn't hurt you. But when I say "You are a corrupt coconut milk!" I am offending you, which is, independen from tis thread is illegal nonethless. People won't be able to use these words to offend people after this thread passes. they will only use them as terms, which is completely harmless on its nature.