Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-20211881-20151030050251/@comment-28639118-20151119014830

CzechOut wrote:

Phanminhnhat wrote: So... this thread won't change anything? 'Cause no templates here make a change. (Except for the one with UG's tabbers) I don't understand what you mean by any of this. What do you mean that "this thread won't change anything"? The point of the thread is to ask the community's permission to go ahead with converting infoboxes to the new portable standard. Almost none of your infoboxes actually use tabber, so any problems we're currently having with tabber functionality can be seen as something requiring future development, not something that should stop us changing over to the portable standard.

Indeed if you go to Special:Insights/nonportableinfoboxes, you'll get a list of the various infoboxes that have not yet been converted, along with the number of pages on which each infoboxes is used. It's very clear there that Plant/Standard is really not an infobox that's like the rest of them. Most pages, by a very wide margin, use tabbed-less infoboxes.

So is there anything really wrong with the styling on the infoboxes that I've demonstrated to you? If not, we can just move to quickly convert the vast majority of your infoboxes and _then_ concentrate on the tabber usage that you're finding problematic. First, thanks for the revive of the tabbers, as they've worked again.

Secondly, because of that, I'll choose Cavia's infobox and end this... Thanks for the list.