Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20160404014125/@comment-7091122-20160404234619

Brainulator9 wrote: Camwood777 wrote Saying "who cares?" is a rhetorical question that indicates that it's pointless to complain about, so yes, that does mean that your complaints are pointless. Your argument that typos are also minor does not apply since typos are indeed relevant. This is not. Your last sentence has no value either since Reddit does not apply to this wiki.

I fail to see how me answering a rhetorical question is a valid reason for you to oppose something that has nothing to do with them. My original statement was to change badges icons and names, but you're using me answering a rhetorical question as a reason for this to not be implemented.

Badges are a relevant part of the wiki, albiet a minor one; heck, one of the several reasons I joined the community was partially, and not a big reason, but I joined partly because of the badges. Even if that reason was a minor reason, I doubt I'd even be here without 'em, so that's why I care so much.

'''Reddit may not apply to the wiki, but the point of the statement was to say that it is just infuriating to look at, since it was just so close to being in a satisfying appearance, but it is barely not. I was using a comparision there, basically.' It bothers me mostly because it was *THIS*'' close to fitting a format, but narrowly didn't. I'm sure someone with OCD would also find the current badges... unpleasant, to say the least of it.

Most importantly, though, is that just because you don't care much for the badges personally, doesn't mean a suggestion involving them instantly becomes pointless, and worth opposing. If you personally don't care for badges, it doesn't mean you should oppose them, unless it's a bad idea in of itself, like adding more badges for unnecessary categories. A neutral would be fitting for an idea that you don't care about, but have no real reason to oppose it.