Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-26945790-20160309105736/@comment-26826553-20160413113924

DatDramaPlant wrote: Yeah, Max had one heck of a history. I was talking about the name b***s***. Even though I would gladly kick a dead horse to vent my anger, I'm over unblocking him. But if he's in a sock and reveals it to me, as long as he does not cause any harm, I do not see any reason to ban him or anything. Max had a history, but the future is not fixed like the past. Even though it was the RECENT past...

And... I don't follow your plan of the spammers thing. If we're going to be positive all the way through, we probably shouldn't think that they're allied unless we have at least a shred of proof. Seriously, why can't we just block them as they come? And I still don't get the part where I'm negative on this matter.

Mate, harboring a guy is almost like secretly unblocking him. It’s like freeing a man who’s supposed to stay behind bars & giving him an alias. It still ain’t right to hide people like that. Here’s an example: a Nazi officer who played a role in killing 6 million Jews was arrested some five to six years ago, even though he didn’t murder anyone over the years following WW2. An individual who murdered even just one man should still be brought to justice; imagine if he repeated that five times over. If you let him remain free, mate, even if he’s innocent at the moment, you’re negating the sentence he is supposed to serve.

And at what part did I talk about the plan of the ticks out there? I did not say they plan to take me down with myself; that is Phanminhat’s thought. And I did not necessarily conclude that they are all working together, mate, but that’s not entirely impossible. In a sense, they are working together to try to whack the wiki’s butt (in vain, because evil never wins in the end).

The negative thought you had: you think the plan is working (:/).

Name bulls**t…what did you mean by that? Did you mean me thinking they love my glorious name? Don’t you realize that I’m turning an insult into a compliment, or what? Mate, I can’t afford to be serious all the time. Seriously, I don’t know if I’m 95% serious, or 95% joker. That is certainly better than me raging.