Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-26239911-20170703210058/@comment-26470588-20170809134425

Mental Skillness wrote: AWikiBoy521 wrote: About the Recent Edit Wars: Why can't we just combine the wordings used between the pre-MS edits and what MS edited in a more professional context? I mean, some of his added information are useful, as long as we cut down the unnecessary stuff and reword his wordings to keep the article "neutral".

Edit: Like what BF10 just did minutes ago (BF10, kudos to you!)

After all, users collaborate together to make good articles on wikis, even if the users don't go well with each other.

Terry has a certain good point regrading about this. MS may not have the best attitude towards users (which some other users had some "grudge" against him), but he still made good points that needed to be considered. Although; I suspect that some users just use the "blaming" against someone just to be "right" about such topic which is unhealthy, not that much valid, and causes even more misunderstanding (after all, MS isn't the only one who does this).

And I just had to do this. Even if I wanted to focus more on life priorities, I still had to do this i said that the strategy could have been edited

quite a few times. well, i think some people have grudges against you that they don't have against AWB. He stated it pretty well though. And still, Nick Archer and MS did the same thing (removing a strategy) but only MS was warned. Is it gonna stay that way?