Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-1764483-20170211004319/@comment-1764483-20170211013254

GamerNerd i wrote:

I would say that IF this gets supported, then we must also create rules to specify:
 * Under what conditions they can be used.
 * Formatting the "defining" of a blind vote
 * Who can use it, or can authorize usage of it (via talk page most likely)

Among others that I can't think of right now. Usage is already limited to discussion moderators, I think.

I know Camwood wasn't trying to censor dissent (as per the original post), but the thing is, it is still possible for someone to have a certain viewpoint while acknowledging the presence of valid opposing counterarguments. "I know smoking is unhealthy, but I do it anyway."