Board Thread:Weekly discussions/@comment-27053902-20161007221024/@comment-26942983-20161012185903

Albert Mc Missle wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: YammaYamer21 wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: YammaYamer21 wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: Don't see anyone complaining about Iron Citron! He's Legendary. Even after years and years, there will only be a few thousand players with it, fewer active. Also, he's not extremely OP, if you exclude Iron Mode(that's what it's called, right), which is more than acceptable. Torchwood, on the other hand, will be with most people who play for more than a couple of months actively. Also, this is the Weekly Discussion, not the GW2 thread(it's OK, I can forget too) Almost everything about Iron Citron is better though. One clip attacks SUCK. Seriously. They're really annoying and I know that from experience in this game and other games(shooters included). Also, truely Legendary.

By truely, I mean as in it's actually hard to get, BTW. 50 damage + splash damage ROCKS!

For close range attacks Torchwood has fire breath. Iron citron has EMPeach which also protects it since zombies can't fire.

For "berserk" mode Iron citron's metal mode beats it comepletely.

For leaf shield Iron citron has peel shield which gives it complete protection from the front while torchwood only has half protection. Plus you get bonus XP.

And if all else fails you can just roll away, or into an enemy base.

So being a true legendary makes it not OP?

I think Torchwood is better than Iron Citron. Why?