Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-1764483-20160131204339/@comment-24024415-20160201224712

OH SNAP FORGOT TO VOTE.

Yeah, you read correctly: if the voting standards are deemed too low and easy to accomplish by the normal user, then just raise it for major votes. It may be contradictory to the statement before, but raising standards for voting siphons out the inexperienced and leaves those who moderately enjoy the wiki and care for its well-being. This I can understand, to take out the people rapidly gaining edits only to grief and troll votes afterwards.

However, the voting rights regarding weighting are ridiculous, full of assumption that "because the user has power, they are responsible". If a power user has alternate motives or becomes corrupt, they can cause far more damage to the wiki that several "blind voters". The opposite can be said for experienced users who do not want the accessories or positions, they have their rights crippled in relation to other users, simply because they do not belong to a position. A normal user can be much more caring and tentative for the wiki than a power user, and the rules need to acknowledge that.