Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-7091122-20170617134530/@comment-26470588-20170620123619

Mental Skillness wrote: Teacup Terry wrote:

Mental Skillness wrote: what i've been saying is that the rule is generally a simple "dont do bad", but the thing is, like i probably said numerous times, this rule would mean nothing to a dictator, or league of dictators, because they could simply remove under the simplest grounds whether or not the rule exists. it. is. pointless. once again, fandom staff. i know they probably wouldn't care, but if they were to go rogue with the rule, we could report them and fandom would at least do something. whereas without the rule, the wiki would just go to garbage.

save the wiki or don't. it's one support template away for you. can you read or something

dude, i stated this all too many times, fandom cannot help because this is their community, this is how they manage it

in the event it's a single member going rogue, then the rules already broken, but in the event of the entire b-crat team does this, we cnat do anything, rule or not..

it's their community, they own it, they manage it, and reporting a community's owners because you dont like how they manage it is literally impossible, unless it breaks the TOU (like sending nudes of underagers, or something like that), which this wouldn't.

it's pointless, for god's sake. To quote the fandom rules page: "Be good to eachother". The section essentially says "Don't be mean to eachother, don't do things that would be bad for others." IF THEY WENT ALL DICTATOR, IT WOULD BE BREAKING THOSE RULES. THEY OWN THE COMMUNITY AND THIS WOULD BE BREAKING THOSE RULES. IT'S NOT POINTLESS. IT COULD SAVE THE WIKI. And one last thing- if it's pointless to you, why don't tou just vote neutral?