Board Thread:Reporting station/@comment-26239911-20170703210058/@comment-26470588-20170809113304

Zombiecrab wrote: Teacup Terry wrote:

Zombiecrab wrote:

Teacup Terry wrote:

LawnDefender072003 wrote:

Teacup Terry wrote:

Zombiecrab wrote:

Teacup Terry wrote:

Zombiecrab wrote: If I added a ridiculous strategy about the "legendary" Small-nut, would the same rules apply? If you added an actual strategy along with it such as "The small-nut can be an incredibly powerful cheap card to use as cannon fodder or as firepower in nut decks." And considering MS did that, maybe you shouldn't be so quick to "ban him as soon as possible." Wanna see what he wrote?

"Weenie Beanie is probably one of the strongest cards in the game, at a cost of 1 providing pretty cheap stats, but having bean synergy attached to it. As such an early game card, you can combo it with things like Admiral Navy Bean and Lily of the Valley. And as an amazing finisher, you can combine its great power with Onion Rings and pull out a 4/4 Weenie Beanie for the cost of 1. There are quite a few amazing strategies, but practically nothing can beat the powerful presence of the legendary Weenie Beanie in its amazing synergy. It's what makes it such a good card in the current meta game.

===Against===

Removal cards such as Locust Swarm, Rocket Science or even Smelly Zombies are highly recommended against this target. The plant hero that uses this the most is Green Shadow, so Rocket Science is a really good counter to Weenie Beanie.

Sometimes, some players misuse the power of the Weenie Beanie, so Weed Spray and Rolling Stone could be viable options, but it's very rare for that. You have to think smart about the hero you're fighting against to know how they will use the power of the Weenie Beanie. They could buff it to its highest with Onion Rings and Lily of the Valley. Citron could defend it and work with Admiral Navy Bean to take you down, which also means Weed Spray would be a pretty viable option there. You could also be facing a Nightcap using Weenie Beanies, which means he's preparing for a Weenie Beanie OTK deck (You use Berry Angry and a few supers to do this) or a Pineclone Deck. And for the last hero's strategy is Rose, which means she'll very likely use Weenie Beanies to a similar degree as to citron but using Weenie Beanie's legendary power with Freeze Cards, and decks that revolve around healing. These are just things to watch out for while fighting Weenie Beanie." Is it just me or do I not see anything wrong there? Considering that he's simply advocating to plan for the worst, your reporting him was misjudged. And if the strategy doesn't work for you, that doesn't mean you can just remove it- that's literally illegal. "practically nothing can beat the powerful presence of the legendary Weenie Beanie in its amazing synergy." " the power of the Weenie Beanie"

" a Weenie Beanie OTK deck (You use Berry Angry and a few supers to do this)"

"Weenie Beanie's legendary power" Yeah, uh, nothing's completely wrong there. If he were to say "Weenie Beanie can OTK the zombie hero in one single hit with no buffs" then he should be punished, but considering he actually uses legitimate strategies, he didn't do anything wrong. And you're breaking rules by removing it- it's illegal to remove a strategy just because it doesn't work for you. In that case, Mental Skillness broke a rule anyway by removing the strategy that was on the page and replacing it with his own. And you broke a rule by removing his. Case closed. I didn't remove his. removed it. Then he did. Case closed.