Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-26239911-20160614110627/@comment-26239911-20160614172209

Camwood777 wrote: ThisUserLikesOreo wrote: Camwood777 wrote:

After reading your vote I can bet that you didn't even read a thing and your vote makes no sense. Pinkgirl234 wrote:
 * 1) Never said this.
 * 2) Don't forget that rollbacks can edit forum posts, so that's more than a button. Maybe we should remove rollback rights completely?
 * 3) Once again, you didn't read what I wrote.

We need to think carefully of the changes that might be made here. A few of these choices seem to say that discussion moderators who don't often go to chat should also be active in chat since they also posses chat moderator rights. I said that the ones who are active in chat must go for chat mod before discussion mod.


 * 1. Well, there's your option for 1.
 * 2. That one comes with all rights IIRC. But still, you act like those 2 buttons are worth blocking out everybody. And no, we shouldn't remove those rights, I have zero idea where you got that idea.
 * 3. Elaborate, because until you can explain exactly how I'm "didn't read it", I'm sticking to my guns on the idea that you're only doing this because you're upset I was able to get chat mod rights via discussion mod, despite the fact I only care about the discussion mod rights.

Again, some users are better discussion mods than chat mods. This vote seems to be willing to completely lock those people out from ever being a discussion mod. And for what reason? Because you don't like how I got a right I don't care for while running for a right I DO care for? I'm not upset, I'm annoyed about this.

If you really only care about discussion mod rights, then why you cared about chat mod rights so much? If you don't care about them, then why the crap you went for chat mod and wanted to have to be in chat moderator group so badly?