Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-29326052-20161024195223/@comment-25368137-20161026220205

Not voting for quite a few reasons, including the biggest one is that i'm just waiting for "the right moment" aka finding a wikia to actually leave here.

But let me leave my 2 cents here.

On one side, you're letting users potentially make a much more "comfortable" (for some people) conversation on Forums, and also allows some jokes to take full extent (Censoring/Changing to a non-swear word sometimes ruins a joke), and at the cost, if an underaged user is around, he will MAYBE learn the word. On some cases, he will just leave it there which MIGHT be bad as he might just say it like it's candy sweet to hear. On other cases, they learn some meanings (cough cough letter after E) which MIGHT cause problems such as them getting into trouble my mentioning that, or who knows. Users who are bothered to see "nude" swears would also be affected in a negative way.

On the /other/ side, you can't predict someone will be triggered by your favorite word that means someone's residues, or whatever, you can't predict if someone is underaged, because secretely they can be of ANY age, like reap, who joined when he was 7 if i'm correct. It's a long shot thrusting someone here wether or not they're underaged, there might EVEN be less people that joined after being on the right age, than underaged people that were here, you never know. Although trying to discover someone's age might seem 100% possible and all, but tell me, before mognox mentioned ppm's secret, who would have thought he was underaged? Or marcia? Or pretty much any user that was underaged? So, in the end of the day you just have to assume they're the age they claim, and if they're lying to sneak in, it's their fault for learning bad words or their meanings or even using them, and also from their parents, "low" fault if they just can't keep an eye on them 24/7, or "high" fault if they just let them do whatever with no punishment.

I feel there isn't a right "side" on this vote, hence, you can "count" this as a neutral (get it, you don't count neutrals)