Board Thread:Internal management/@comment-27744487-20160313111939/@comment-25648422-20160313144144

Ancestral Skeptre wrote: Itsleo20 wrote: Ancestral Skeptre wrote: ThisUserLikesOreo wrote:

Ancestral Skeptre wrote:

ThisUserLikesOreo wrote:

Ancestral Skeptre wrote:

ThisUserLikesOreo wrote:

Ancestral Skeptre wrote:

Pinkgirl234 wrote: To be honest this is so all unfair. Literally. Does anyone remember Carp the Fish? He wasn't even given a highlighted voting if he should be kept blocked or not when he was unblocked and YET Max can get a highlighted voting to be unblocked when a few people wanted him back as if he as an exception. This is the main problem: users want a single person released from his permanent block just because they are his/her friend. Really? Just because that permanently blocked user is your friend? No offense intended here, just because of friendship. What if one of your friends happens to be Nazi Peashooter and you want his permanent block to be removed just because he is your "friend"? Why do we have to make a really really enormous issue about just one person's a permanent block? Does anyone even know how permanent blocks often work? They work when the previous damage done has gone too far, the user made tons of severe offenses, or when they were given one last chance to change and they wasted it. If we are all so concerned about one person's permanent block here, then let's all have community votings about every other permanent blocks of other users, even your permanently blocked "friends" in order to be fair.

A permanently blocked can be forgiven. They can apologize but it won't lift their blocks if they are permanently blocked in a fairly-set manner. If your friend is permanently blocked, does that terminate your friendship immediately? If you want to keep contact with that friend of yours, chat or edit in another wiki, simple as that! There's billions of wikis that you can use in order to keep contact with your permanently-blocked "friend". You can go use a wiki with that person together. You can use external websites like Facebook or Twitter or any external forum or chat websites.

Can we serious MOVE ON from this? This issue about MaxStories has been since 2014 and guess what year we are in now? 2016! 2016 people! This issue has been currently running for almost three full years now.

Lastly, blocks are at the discretion of administrators. Let them handle the blocking. You highlighted a thread.

A no,not because he js their friend,but because A PERSON GOT BLOCKED FOR NOTHING.

And then,even after a fair voting which unblcocked that person,he gets blcoked again.FOR NOTHING

Why do you people ignore this most important part of the entire story.

Carp should be unblocked too,its equal. Lies.

lolno

When?

lolno again You were not a user then!

Wtf?

PurplePi accused Max of being a hacker.They tristed PurplePi.

Then,PurplePi got blocked.

People forgot about Max

And then,Max got unblocked by voting,but bureucrat banned him without a reason.

If you want a argument,please,say something that makes sense. I wasn't a user when? When this thread was highlighted?

Don't remember abou that, but I remember Max calling PurplePi a c**t in Serbian.

There were tons of reasons for him to be blocked.

Your arguments make less sense than mine. But,remember that he got unblocked by voting?

Why did he got banned then?

also,4th ban is 1 year,not infinite I think that all of the threads lost. No,the first thread won. Did you check the thread?

Personally, I don't remember the results. However, if you are incorrect, then you are basing your argument on a false assumption. No,I checked the thread.He got unblcoked.

Horewer,after that,he went to chat,and when bureucrat saw him,he blocked him.

After that,a second thread about unblocking him opened.But users thought max swore again after he got unblocked.So,they opposed.

And bam,he gets blocked because of abusive bureuccrat.Check the ban log. You are calling Usefulguy an abusive administrator? Tsk, tsk I wonder what he would say if he see what you said. You need to determine an abusive administrator from a fair administrator because at this point, your assumption is clearly weak.