Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2/@comment-26348973-20160209035618/@comment-26942983-20160210182338

TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: TheGollddMAN wrote: IG Gaming + Maramok= Awesome wrote: Plants vs Zombies 2 - Modern Day - Day 26: Crazy Raptor (Demo Gameplay) - YouTubeHoly Cow Couldn't reply in time due to thread closing but your point about comparing yourself to Einstein was insignificant as well. Truly quaint. Insignificant, but not invalid like yours. If it's insignificant, then it's automatically becomes invalid. No one gives validity to an insignificant point as that's redundant.

You comparing yourself to Einstein is insignificant and invalid at the same time as that's hard to fathom you claiming yourself to be as good as him. I've seen people who think high of themselves but you are one vain individual. For the last time, I wasn't comparing myself with him! I was making the perfectly valid point that even if nobody believes what I say, I could still be right! And I, too, have made the perfectly valid point that you could have made that statement in a more general sense. There was no need for a comparison as no one asked for it. You could have very well wrote that statement without comparing yourself to him and the point could have been made otherwise. Well, try to make a more general statement then! It's not that easy! Then that means you're incompetent at general speech. Okay then here's a general statement:

"Well personally, I believe that single use plants fall under instants category as that's how I like to think of them. I understand not all will agree but this is my kind of thought because [so and so reasons]."

There you go. A very personal but yet humble and generalised opinion based on your train of thought which was easy to write unlike what you think thus proving your statement false. Ahem, you changed my point! My point is that even when everybody disagrees with me, I could still be right! You understood that sentence wrong. Even when you write that sentence it can perfectly convey the message that you are right on your own accord even when others disagree but in a more humble way. But you chose the route of "Nope, I'm right because screw your opinion" attitude. Well, if you take it that way, that's not my problem. But I can say that I didn't mean to give you that impression. Well isn't that convenient. How?