Board Thread:Plants vs. Zombies 2: It's About Time/@comment-24922984-20150522195938/@comment-28129931-20150523195519

TheGollddMAN wrote:  So, please, before you start making fanboyish arguments, come up with legitimate reasons rather than saying "they shouldn't". Just so you're satisfied with the game, doesn't mean that everyone should. Well, why they should?

I... don't see many people who care that much about amount of plants. And I already said argument "as long as they provide interesting levels and challeges, amount of plants doesn't really matter" there's so many interesting combos with plants anyway, why we need more?

I'm not a fanboy (I played only first and second part of the game). I just don't see complaints that reasonable. I mean, yes, It would be nice to have more plants, but they seem doing fine without it. We don't just use in every new world only plants, that we've got here, right? How older plants will work against new zombies, how good these new plants in previous worlds? With every new chapter amount of these combinations and tests that we could do increases even more, which should lead us to the conclusion - we don't need many plants because we could have enough fun with these.

And about permament upgrades - you never though that there might be a reason why they don't want make more? It's doesn't seem to be so hard to place one on the map. Maybe they don't want make game too different from the begining or something?