Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-7530765-20150502162439/@comment-25089892-20150502212322

1Zulu wrote:

Electromario2001 wrote: Everyone opposed Bearjedi's version of this thread because "he just wanted it for his bureaucrat rights" (I counted a tie between). I don't find it fair to let users give fake reasons to vote in a thread. I think we should disqualify those votes with that lie. What do you think? (Oppose requires reason, and I'm talking in general, not only for my personal gain. Votes saying I'm doing it for myself will be disqualified.)

Why does oppose require a reason, but not support?

Starting votes like this is a blatant attempt to tip the scales in favor of the viewpoint you support. Not cool. Either you require a reason for both support and oppose, or you don't require a reason at all.

How many reasons you have on supporting and how many on opposing? Most supports here mean "I agree", "we should do it", "this is good option", so it's quite obvious it doesn't need a reason. Oppose, on the other hand, can have multiple or even dozens of reasons like "I don't care", "Because lies r cool", "Because x, x and x" etc.