Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-7091122-20170207035621/@comment-7091122-20170209140852

Pinkgirl234 wrote:

Counter-arguments:
 * We do have a way of addressing inconsistent genders (see: only using the one that's more commonly used) already added for the way we're implementing this.
 * Generally speaking, they're all treated as the same gender with each of those plants. So, unless a plant like Threepeater shows up that has each head as a different gender, this is invalid as there's no such thing in the series so far.
 * That'd be grammatically incorrect; there's no plural AND gender-neutral pronouns, as far as I am aware of.

Ultimately, it comes off more as though you're just trying to find ways to oppose a tired argument, as you even said that you wish this sort of thing would stop being a thing. While I can't be for sure that's the case, the reasons don't really add up, as far as I am aware.