Board Thread:Wiki management/@comment-18464102-20170928132636/@comment-30613644-20170930080554

DatDramaPlant wrote: Brainzzwhatevzz wrote: why the fck are people bringing up fire rooster

that was a totally different case

animals are referred as "it" if it has a close relationship to you, AKA a pet. Also in children fabels where they can talk and stuff.

so unless you are saying you have a close relationship to a fire cck, it stays as an it You really shouldn't bring real life stuff into the gaming world because I don't see anyone calling plants "he" or "she" either. And before you say that plants in real life have genders, "rooster" automatically means male. So if we're going by the logic of real life and calling Fire Rooster "it", shouldn't we apply logic of real life and call Pumpking "it" as well?

Third time I'm saying this in this thread, but why couldn't we just stick to gender-neutrality?

plants in this game are anthropomorphised, which falls into the other category which one can refer to with gender pronouns. Fire rooster however, is just a reanimated corpse of a rooster and display no human characteristics which still classify it as an "it"